These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27560557)

  • 21. Induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix: how does BMI affect success? (‡).
    Lassiter JR; Holliday N; Lewis DF; Mulekar M; Abshire J; Brocato B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Sep; 29(18):3000-2. PubMed ID: 26513375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Oral misoprostol vs. intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial.
    Gherman RB; Browning J; O'Boyle A; Goodwin TM
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jul; 46(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 11499184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is vaginal misoprostol more effective than oral misoprostol for cervical ripening in obese women?
    Soni S; Pappas K; Lesser ML; Blitz MJ; Augustine SA; Rochelson B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Oct; 33(20):3476-3483. PubMed ID: 30741048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Cervical ripening at term. A randomized and prospective study: Misoprotol versus dinoprostone].
    Trabelsi H; Mathlouthi N; Zayen S; Dhouib M; Chaabene K; Trabelsi K; Amouri H; Ben Ayed B; Guermazi M
    Tunis Med; 2012 May; 90(5):362-9. PubMed ID: 22585642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Induction to delivery interval using transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol: A comparative study at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.
    Garba I; Muhammed AS; Muhammad Z; Galadanci HS; Ayyuba R; Abubakar IS
    Ann Afr Med; 2016; 15(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 27549415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of cervical ripening modalities among overweight and obese nulliparous gravidas.
    Sarumi MA; Gherman RB; Bell TD; Jairath P; Johnson MJ; Burgess AL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Nov; 33(22):3804-3808. PubMed ID: 30810422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of prostaglandin and mechanical cervical ripening in the setting of small for gestational age neonates.
    Rossi RM; Warshak CR; Masters HR; Regan JK; Kritzer SA; Magner KP
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3841-3846. PubMed ID: 29739262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Tran S; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1237-40; discussion 1240-3. PubMed ID: 12066104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Cecatti JG; Tedesco RP; Pires HM; Calderon IM; Faúndes A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Predicting factors on cervical ripening and response to induction in women pregnant over 37 weeks.
    Bahadori F; Ayatollahi H; Naghavi-Behzad M; Khalkhali H; Naseri Z
    Med Ultrason; 2013 Sep; 15(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 23979614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pregnancy outcomes after failed cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 followed by Foley balloon catheter.
    Mizrachi Y; Levy M; Weiner E; Bar J; Barda G; Kovo M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Oct; 29(19):3229-33. PubMed ID: 26572735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Randomization of two dosing regimens of vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction in a low resource setting.
    Adeniyi AA; Odukogbe AA; Olayemi A; Oladokun O; Adeniji AO; Aimakhu CO; Enakpene C
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 24714004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared.
    Greybush M; Singleton C; Atlas RO; Balducci J; Rust OA
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jan; 46(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11209625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.
    McMaster K; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24989790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations.
    Wing DA; Fassett MJ; Guberman C; Tran S; Parrish A; Guinn D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. PubMed ID: 15284771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.