These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2756081)

  • 1. Electrodermal lability and visual information processing.
    Wilson KG; Graham RS
    Psychophysiology; 1989 May; 26(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 2756081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrodermal lability and simple reaction time.
    Wilson KG
    Biol Psychol; 1987 Jun; 24(3):275-89. PubMed ID: 3663801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrodermal lability: individual differences affecting perceptual speed and vigilance performance in 9 to 16 year-old children.
    Sakai LM; Baker LA; Dawson ME
    Psychophysiology; 1992 Mar; 29(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 1635963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrodermal lability, errors, and reaction times: an examination of the motor impulsivity hypothesis.
    Vossel G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1988 Mar; 6(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 3372270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-modal physiological effects of electrodermal lability in the detection of deception.
    Waid WM; Wilson SK; Orne MT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1981 Jun; 40(6):1118-25. PubMed ID: 7264879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Processing demands, effort, and individual differences in four different vigilance tasks.
    Koelega HS; Brinkman JA; Hendriks L; Verbaten MN
    Hum Factors; 1989 Feb; 31(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 2707818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrodermal lability and myocardial reactivity to stress.
    Kelsey RM
    Psychophysiology; 1991 Nov; 28(6):619-31. PubMed ID: 1816589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personality and electrodermal response lability: an interpretation.
    Crider A
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2008 Sep; 33(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 18509756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Arousal, working memory, and conscious awareness in contingency learning.
    Cosand LD; Cavanagh TM; Brown AA; Courtney CG; Rissling AJ; Schell AM; Dawson ME
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1105-13. PubMed ID: 18573667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of habitual caffeine use and acute ingestion: testing a biobehavioral model.
    Smith BD; Rafferty J; Lindgren K; Smith DA; Nespor A
    Physiol Behav; 1992 Jan; 51(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 1741439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond drug effects and dependent variables: the use of the Poisson-Erlang model to assess the effects of D-amphetamine on information processing.
    Halliday R; Gregory K; Naylor H; Callaway E; Yano L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Feb; 73(1):35-54. PubMed ID: 2180255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrodermal lability as an indicator for subjective sleepiness during total sleep deprivation.
    Michael L; Passmann S; Becker R
    J Sleep Res; 2012 Aug; 21(4):470-8. PubMed ID: 22150963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The measurement of electrodermal activity].
    Grapperon J; Pignol AC; Vion-Dury J
    Encephale; 2012 Apr; 38(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 22516273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrodermal measures of attention and effort to stimulus onset and offset for intramodal and intermodal tasks.
    Greene RL; Kille SE; Hogan FA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Apr; 48(2):411-8. PubMed ID: 461041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Change in the event-related skin conductivity: an indicator of the immediate importance of elaborate information processing?].
    Zimmer H
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(3):493-513. PubMed ID: 1441653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultradian rhythms of reaction times in performance in vigilance tasks.
    Conte S; Ferlazzo F; Renzi P
    Biol Psychol; 1995 Feb; 39(2-3):159-72. PubMed ID: 7734628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EP components, visual processing stages, and the effect of a barbiturate.
    Frowein HW; Gaillard AW; Varey CA
    Biol Psychol; 1981 Dec; 13():239-49. PubMed ID: 7342993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Information processing through the first year of life: a longitudinal study using the visual expectation paradigm.
    Canfield RL; Smith EG; Brezsnyak MP; Snow KL
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1997; 62(2):1-145. PubMed ID: 9353949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in infant visual attention: are short lookers faster processors or feature processors?
    Colombo J; Mitchell DW; Coldren JT; Freeseman LJ
    Child Dev; 1991 Dec; 62(6):1247-57. PubMed ID: 1786713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new approach to cerebral asymmetry: RT differences in simultaneous bimanual finger movement during verbal and nonverbal tasks.
    Wünscher T; Jordan K; Gille HG; Roth N
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Apr; 70(2):543-8. PubMed ID: 2342853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.