These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27561650)

  • 1. Material model of pelvic bone based on modal analysis: a study on the composite bone.
    Henyš P; Čapek L
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Feb; 16(1):363-373. PubMed ID: 27561650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finite element study of human pelvis model in side impact for Chinese adult occupants.
    Ma Z; Lan F; Chen J; Liu W
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 25133596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of density-elasticity relationships for finite element modeling of human pelvic bone by modal analysis.
    Scholz R; Hoffmann F; von Sachsen S; Drossel WG; Klöhn C; Voigt C
    J Biomech; 2013 Oct; 46(15):2667-73. PubMed ID: 24001928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational modal analysis of a composite pelvic bone: convergence and validation studies.
    Henyš P; Čapek L
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Jul; 22(9):916-924. PubMed ID: 30999766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of orthotropic bone elastic constants using FEA and modal analysis.
    Taylor WR; Roland E; Ploeg H; Hertig D; Klabunde R; Warner MD; Hobatho MC; Rakotomanana L; Clift SE
    J Biomech; 2002 Jun; 35(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 12020996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed-tomography-based finite-element models of long bones can accurately capture strain response to bending and torsion.
    Varghese B; Short D; Penmetsa R; Goswami T; Hangartner T
    J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1374-9. PubMed ID: 21288523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical and textural properties of pelvic trabecular bone.
    Dalstra M; Huiskes R; Odgaard A; van Erning L
    J Biomech; 1993; 26(4-5):523-35. PubMed ID: 8478354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numerical evaluation of bulk material properties of dental composites using two-phase finite element models.
    Li J; Li H; Fok AS; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2012 Sep; 28(9):996-1003. PubMed ID: 22727356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Use of a Vibro-Acoustic Based Method to Determine the Composite Material Properties of a Replicate Clavicle Bone Model.
    Goossens Q; Vancleef S; Leuridan S; Pastrav LC; Mulier M; Desmet W; Vander Sloten J; Denis K
    J Funct Biomater; 2020 Sep; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 32987709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of replicate composite bone material properties using modal analysis.
    Leuridan S; Goossens Q; Pastrav L; Roosen J; Mulier M; Denis K; Desmet W; Sloten JV
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Feb; 66():12-18. PubMed ID: 27829191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of the Young's modulus of the human pars tensa using in-situ pressurization and inverse finite-element analysis.
    Rohani SA; Ghomashchi S; Agrawal SK; Ladak HM
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():69-78. PubMed ID: 28087415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies.
    Anderson AE; Peters CL; Tuttle BD; Weiss JA
    J Biomech Eng; 2005 Jun; 127(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 16060343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constructing anisotropic finite element model of bone from computed tomography (CT).
    Kazembakhshi S; Luo Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2619-26. PubMed ID: 25226965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FE and experimental study on how the cortex material properties of synthetic femurs affect strain levels.
    Lopes VMM; Neto MA; Amaro AM; Roseiro LM; Paulino MF
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Aug; 46():96-109. PubMed ID: 28645848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relating age and micro-architecture with apparent-level elastic constants: a micro-finite element study of female cortical bone from the anterior femoral midshaft.
    Donaldson FE; Pankaj P; Cooper DM; Thomas CD; Clement JG; Simpson AH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Jun; 225(6):585-96. PubMed ID: 22034742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of Young's modulus of loaded implants on bone remodeling: an experimental and numerical study in the goat knee.
    Stoppie N; Van Oosterwyck H; Jansen J; Wolke J; Wevers M; Naert I
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Sep; 90(3):792-803. PubMed ID: 18615463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element model development of a child pelvis with optimization-based material identification.
    Kim JE; Li Z; Ito Y; Huber CD; Shih AM; Eberhardt AW; Yang KH; King AI; Soni BK
    J Biomech; 2009 Sep; 42(13):2191-5. PubMed ID: 19646702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trabecular plates and rods determine elastic modulus and yield strength of human trabecular bone.
    Wang J; Zhou B; Liu XS; Fields AJ; Sanyal A; Shi X; Adams M; Keaveny TM; Guo XE
    Bone; 2015 Mar; 72():71-80. PubMed ID: 25460571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and validation of patient-specific finite element models of the hemipelvis generated from a sparse CT data set.
    Shim VB; Pitto RP; Streicher RM; Hunter PJ; Anderson IA
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051010. PubMed ID: 19045517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.