These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2756168)

  • 1. Critical assessment of carcinogenic risk policy.
    Flamm WG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1989 Jun; 9(3):216-24. PubMed ID: 2756168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cancer policy framework for: public health assessment of carcinogens in the environment.
    DeRosa CT; Stevens YW; Johnson BL
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1993; 9(4):559-75. PubMed ID: 8296311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing uncertainty in risk assessment by using specific knowledge to replace default options.
    McClellan RO
    Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):149-79. PubMed ID: 8744594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The linearized multistage model and the future of quantitative risk assessment.
    Crump KS
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1996 Oct; 15(10):787-98. PubMed ID: 8906427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pesticide residues in food: investigation of disparities in cancer risk estimates.
    Swirsky Gold L; Stern BR; Slone TH; Brown JP; Manley NB; Ames BN
    Cancer Lett; 1997 Aug; 117(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 9377547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Topics in cancer risk assessment.
    Olin SS; Neumann DA; Foran JA; Scarano GJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 1997 Feb; 105 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):117-26. PubMed ID: 9114281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critical discussion of carcinogenic risk policy.
    Barnard RC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1989 Jun; 9(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 2756169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk assessment of carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic chemicals.
    Johannsen FR
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 1990; 20(5):341-67. PubMed ID: 2202326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alleged misconceptions' distort perceptions of environmental cancer risks.
    Tomatis L; Melnick RL; Haseman J; Barrett JC; Huff J
    FASEB J; 2001 Jan; 15(1):195-203. PubMed ID: 11149907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chemical carcinogens: a review of the science and its associated principles. U.S. Interagency Staff Group on Carcinogens.
    Environ Health Perspect; 1986 Aug; 67():201-82. PubMed ID: 3530737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of risk assessment to food safety decision making.
    Rodricks J; Taylor MR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1983 Sep; 3(3):275-307. PubMed ID: 6635270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding population and individual risk assessment: the case of polychlorinated biphenyls.
    Shields PG
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 May; 15(5):830-9. PubMed ID: 16702358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Toxicological basis for evaluating health risk].
    Rolecki R; Dutkiewicz T; Kończalik J
    Med Pr; 1992; 43(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 1406237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Update of potency factors for asbestos-related lung cancer and mesothelioma.
    Berman DW; Crump KS
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2008; 38 Suppl 1():1-47. PubMed ID: 18671157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perspectives of comparing risks of environmental carcinogens.
    Perera F; Boffetta P
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1988 Oct; 80(16):1282-93. PubMed ID: 3050138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk assessment and the credibility of federal regulatory policy: an FDA perspective.
    Lowe MF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1989 Apr; 9(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 2717788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk assessment for carcinogens under California's Proposition 65.
    Pease WS; Zeise L; Kelter A
    Risk Anal; 1990 Jun; 10(2):255-71. PubMed ID: 2367711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific trends in risk assessment research.
    Anderson EL
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1989 Oct; 5(5):777-90. PubMed ID: 2683223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of 'secondary mechanism' in the regulation of carcinogens; a chronology.
    Scheuplein RJ
    Cancer Lett; 1995 Jun; 93(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 7600537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.