These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27561841)

  • 1. How long is now? The multiple timescales of language processing.
    Honey CJ; Chen J; Müsch K; Hasson U
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e77. PubMed ID: 27561841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linguistics, cognitive psychology, and the Now-or-Never bottleneck.
    Endress AD; Katzir R
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e71. PubMed ID: 27561603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Memory limitations and chunking are variable and cannot explain language structure.
    MacDonald MC
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e84. PubMed ID: 27562618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Language processing is not a race against time.
    Baggio G; Vicario CM
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e64. PubMed ID: 27562073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Natural chunk-and-pass language processing: Just another joint source-channel coding model?
    Clark KB
    Commun Integr Biol; 2018; 11(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 30083286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language.
    Christiansen MH; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e62. PubMed ID: 25869618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Many important language universals are not reducible to processing or cognition.
    Medeiros DP; Piattelli-Palmarini M; Bever TG
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e86. PubMed ID: 27562411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pro and con: Internal speech and the evolution of complex language.
    Behme C
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e65. PubMed ID: 27562186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Now or … later: Perceptual data are not immediately forgotten during language processing.
    Bicknell K; Jaeger TF; Tanenhaus MK
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e67. PubMed ID: 27562505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is Now-or-Never language processing good enough?
    Ferreira F; Christianson K
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e72. PubMed ID: 27561219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Realizing the Now-or-Never bottleneck and Chunk-and-Pass processing with Item-Order-Rank working memories and masking field chunking networks.
    Grossberg S
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e75. PubMed ID: 27561607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the generalizability of the Chunk-and-Pass processing approach: Perspectives from language acquisition and music.
    Lakshmanan U; Graham RE
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e80. PubMed ID: 27562199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hierarchical process memory: memory as an integral component of information processing.
    Hasson U; Chen J; Honey CJ
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2015 Jun; 19(6):304-13. PubMed ID: 25980649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Introduction to the special issue: parsimony and redundancy in models of language.
    Wiechmann D; Kerz E; Snider N; Jaeger TF
    Lang Speech; 2013 Sep; 56(Pt 3):257-64. PubMed ID: 24416956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Language acquisition is model-based rather than model-free.
    Wang FH; Mintz TH
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e89. PubMed ID: 27561372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gestalt-like representations hijack Chunk-and-Pass processing.
    Dumitru ML
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e69. PubMed ID: 27562687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conceptual short-term memory (CSTM) supports core claims of Christiansen and Chater.
    Potter MC
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e88. PubMed ID: 27561216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Natural language processing and the Now-or-Never bottleneck.
    Gómez-Rodríguez C
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e74. PubMed ID: 27561430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consequences of the Now-or-Never bottleneck for signed versus spoken languages.
    Emmorey K
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e70. PubMed ID: 27562833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interrelationships Between Working Memory, Processing Speed, and Language Development in the Age Range 2-4 years.
    Newbury J; Klee T; Stokes SF; Moran C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 59(5):1146-1158. PubMed ID: 27732718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.