BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

913 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27562018)

  • 1. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations.
    Misini Ignjatović M; Caldararu O; Dong G; Muñoz-Gutierrez C; Adasme-Carreño F; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):707-730. PubMed ID: 27565797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blinded predictions of binding modes and energies of HSP90-α ligands for the 2015 D3R grand challenge.
    Mey ASJS; Juárez-Jiménez J; Hennessy A; Michel J
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2016 Oct; 24(20):4890-4899. PubMed ID: 27485604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting binding poses and affinities for protein - ligand complexes in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge using a physical model with a statistical parameter estimation.
    Grudinin S; Kadukova M; Eisenbarth A; Marillet S; Cazals F
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):791-804. PubMed ID: 27718029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.
    Gathiaka S; Liu S; Chiu M; Yang H; Stuckey JA; Kang YN; Delproposto J; Kubish G; Dunbar JB; Carlson HA; Burley SK; Walters WP; Amaro RE; Feher VA; Gilson MK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):651-668. PubMed ID: 27696240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using physics-based pose predictions and free energy perturbation calculations to predict binding poses and relative binding affinities for FXR ligands in the D3R Grand Challenge 2.
    Athanasiou C; Vasilakaki S; Dellis D; Cournia Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 29119352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interaction with specific HSP90 residues as a scoring function: validation in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Santos-Martins D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):731-742. PubMed ID: 27549813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3.
    He X; Man VH; Ji B; Xie XQ; Wang J
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 30218199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving binding mode and binding affinity predictions of docking by ligand-based search of protein conformations: evaluation in D3R grand challenge 2015.
    Xu X; Yan C; Zou X
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Aug; 31(8):689-699. PubMed ID: 28668990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Kumar A; Zhang KY
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):685-693. PubMed ID: 27484214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular docking performance evaluated on the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 drug-like ligand datasets.
    Selwa E; Martiny VY; Iorga BI
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):829-839. PubMed ID: 27699554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ranking docking poses by graph matching of protein-ligand interactions: lessons learned from the D3R Grand Challenge 2.
    da Silva Figueiredo Celestino Gomes P; Da Silva F; Bret G; Rognan D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 28766097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Docking-undocking combination applied to the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Ruiz-Carmona S; Barril X
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):805-815. PubMed ID: 27709317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved pose and affinity predictions using different protocols tailored on the basis of data availability.
    Prathipati P; Nagao C; Ahmad S; Mizuguchi K
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):817-828. PubMed ID: 27714493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal strategies for virtual screening of induced-fit and flexible target in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge.
    Ye Z; Baumgartner MP; Wingert BM; Camacho CJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):695-706. PubMed ID: 27573981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinguishing binders from false positives by free energy calculations: fragment screening against the flap site of HIV protease.
    Deng N; Forli S; He P; Perryman A; Wickstrom L; Vijayan RS; Tiefenbrunn T; Stout D; Gallicchio E; Olson AJ; Levy RM
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):976-88. PubMed ID: 25189630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving Prediction Accuracy of Binding Free Energies and Poses of HIV Integrase Complexes Using the Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method with Flattening Potentials.
    Xia J; Flynn W; Levy RM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jul; 58(7):1356-1371. PubMed ID: 29927237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blinded evaluation of cathepsin S inhibitors from the D3RGC3 dataset using molecular docking and free energy calculations.
    Chaput L; Selwa E; Elisée E; Iorga BI
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 30206740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3.
    Kumar A; Zhang KYJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 30084081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative binding affinity prediction of farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 using FEP.
    Schindler C; Rippmann F; Kuhn D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):265-272. PubMed ID: 28900792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.