916 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27562018)
1. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations.
Misini Ignjatović M; Caldararu O; Dong G; Muñoz-Gutierrez C; Adasme-Carreño F; Ryde U
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):707-730. PubMed ID: 27565797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blinded predictions of binding modes and energies of HSP90-α ligands for the 2015 D3R grand challenge.
Mey ASJS; Juárez-Jiménez J; Hennessy A; Michel J
Bioorg Med Chem; 2016 Oct; 24(20):4890-4899. PubMed ID: 27485604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting binding poses and affinities for protein - ligand complexes in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge using a physical model with a statistical parameter estimation.
Grudinin S; Kadukova M; Eisenbarth A; Marillet S; Cazals F
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):791-804. PubMed ID: 27718029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.
Gathiaka S; Liu S; Chiu M; Yang H; Stuckey JA; Kang YN; Delproposto J; Kubish G; Dunbar JB; Carlson HA; Burley SK; Walters WP; Amaro RE; Feher VA; Gilson MK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):651-668. PubMed ID: 27696240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using physics-based pose predictions and free energy perturbation calculations to predict binding poses and relative binding affinities for FXR ligands in the D3R Grand Challenge 2.
Athanasiou C; Vasilakaki S; Dellis D; Cournia Z
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 29119352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interaction with specific HSP90 residues as a scoring function: validation in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Santos-Martins D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):731-742. PubMed ID: 27549813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3.
He X; Man VH; Ji B; Xie XQ; Wang J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 30218199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving binding mode and binding affinity predictions of docking by ligand-based search of protein conformations: evaluation in D3R grand challenge 2015.
Xu X; Yan C; Zou X
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Aug; 31(8):689-699. PubMed ID: 28668990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Kumar A; Zhang KY
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):685-693. PubMed ID: 27484214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Molecular docking performance evaluated on the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 drug-like ligand datasets.
Selwa E; Martiny VY; Iorga BI
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):829-839. PubMed ID: 27699554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ranking docking poses by graph matching of protein-ligand interactions: lessons learned from the D3R Grand Challenge 2.
da Silva Figueiredo Celestino Gomes P; Da Silva F; Bret G; Rognan D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 28766097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Docking-undocking combination applied to the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Ruiz-Carmona S; Barril X
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):805-815. PubMed ID: 27709317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved pose and affinity predictions using different protocols tailored on the basis of data availability.
Prathipati P; Nagao C; Ahmad S; Mizuguchi K
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):817-828. PubMed ID: 27714493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal strategies for virtual screening of induced-fit and flexible target in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge.
Ye Z; Baumgartner MP; Wingert BM; Camacho CJ
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):695-706. PubMed ID: 27573981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distinguishing binders from false positives by free energy calculations: fragment screening against the flap site of HIV protease.
Deng N; Forli S; He P; Perryman A; Wickstrom L; Vijayan RS; Tiefenbrunn T; Stout D; Gallicchio E; Olson AJ; Levy RM
J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):976-88. PubMed ID: 25189630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving Prediction Accuracy of Binding Free Energies and Poses of HIV Integrase Complexes Using the Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method with Flattening Potentials.
Xia J; Flynn W; Levy RM
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jul; 58(7):1356-1371. PubMed ID: 29927237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blinded evaluation of cathepsin S inhibitors from the D3RGC3 dataset using molecular docking and free energy calculations.
Chaput L; Selwa E; Elisée E; Iorga BI
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 30206740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3.
Kumar A; Zhang KYJ
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 30084081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relative binding affinity prediction of farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 using FEP.
Schindler C; Rippmann F; Kuhn D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):265-272. PubMed ID: 28900792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
