132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27562762)
1. Estimating valence from the sound of a word: Computational, experimental, and cross-linguistic evidence.
Louwerse M; Qu Z
Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):849-855. PubMed ID: 27562762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Why 'piss' is ruder than 'pee'? The role of sound in affective meaning making.
Aryani A; Conrad M; Schmidtke D; Jacobs A
PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198430. PubMed ID: 29874293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of affective phonological iconicity in online language processing: Evidence from a letter search task.
Schmidtke D; Conrad M
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Oct; 147(10):1544-1552. PubMed ID: 30272466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual attention shift to printed words during spoken word recognition in Chinese: The role of phonological information.
Shen W; Qu Q; Tong X
Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):642-654. PubMed ID: 29372533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-Arbitrariness in Mapping Word Form to Meaning: Cross-Linguistic Formal Markers of Word Concreteness.
Reilly J; Hung J; Westbury C
Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41(4):1071-1089. PubMed ID: 26988464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Semantic information mediates visual attention during spoken word recognition in Chinese: Evidence from the printed-word version of the visual-world paradigm.
Shen W; Qu Q; Li X
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1267-84. PubMed ID: 26993126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural representational similarity between L1 and L2 in spoken and written language processing.
Kim SY; Liu L; Liu L; Cao F
Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Dec; 41(17):4935-4951. PubMed ID: 32820847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The phonological form of lexical items modulates the encoding of challenging second-language sound contrasts.
Llompart M; Reinisch E
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1590-1610. PubMed ID: 32162959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sound symbolism in sighted and blind. The role of vision and orthography in sound-shape correspondences.
Bottini R; Barilari M; Collignon O
Cognition; 2019 Apr; 185():62-70. PubMed ID: 30660923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time course of Chinese monosyllabic spoken word recognition: evidence from ERP analyses.
Zhao J; Guo J; Zhou F; Shu H
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1761-70. PubMed ID: 21382389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Japanese written pseudowords can be conditioned to Japanese spoken words with positive, negative, and active emotions.
Ando M; Kambara T
Cogn Process; 2023 Aug; 24(3):387-413. PubMed ID: 37450232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Syllable or phoneme? A mouse-tracking investigation of phonological units in Mandarin Chinese and English spoken word recognition.
Lin YC; Lin PY; Yeh LH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Jan; 49(1):130-176. PubMed ID: 35679219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of valence and arousal on emotional word processing are modulated by concreteness: Behavioral and ERP evidence from a lexical decision task.
Yao Z; Yu D; Wang L; Zhu X; Guo J; Wang Z
Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Dec; 110():231-242. PubMed ID: 27432482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phonological-orthographic consistency for Japanese words and its impact on visual and auditory word recognition.
Hino Y; Kusunose Y; Miyamura S; Lupker SJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):126-146. PubMed ID: 27808550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic mappings of sound to meaning: A theoretical review.
Haslett DA; Cai ZG
Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Apr; 31(2):627-648. PubMed ID: 37803232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Eye movements reveal persistent sensitivity to sound symbolism during word learning.
Revill KP; Namy LL; Nygaard LC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):680-698. PubMed ID: 29094990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Knowing the Meaning of a Word by the Linguistic and Perceptual Company It Keeps.
Louwerse MM
Top Cogn Sci; 2018 Jul; 10(3):573-589. PubMed ID: 29851286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-intentional but not automatic: reduction of word- and arrow-based compatibility effects by sound distractors in the same categorical domain.
Miles JD; Proctor RW
Exp Brain Res; 2009 Oct; 199(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 19688202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning.
Nygaard LC; Cook AE; Namy LL
Cognition; 2009 Jul; 112(1):181-6. PubMed ID: 19447384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ERP evidence for implicit L2 word stress knowledge in listeners of a fixed-stress language.
Kóbor A; Honbolygó F; Becker ABC; Schild U; Csépe V; Friedrich CK
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jun; 128():100-110. PubMed ID: 29654788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
