154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27562768)
1. The utility of quantitative ADC values for differentiating high-risk from low-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shaish H; Kang SK; Rosenkrantz AB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jan; 42(1):260-270. PubMed ID: 27562768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Performance of Monoexponential DWI Versus Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Si Y; Liu RB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):358-368. PubMed ID: 29812977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Ratio Versus Conventional ADC for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With 3-T MRI.
Bajgiran AM; Mirak SA; Sung K; Sisk AE; Reiter RE; Raman SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Sep; 213(3):W134-W142. PubMed ID: 31216201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis.
Godley KC; Syer TJ; Toms AP; Smith TO; Johnson G; Cameron D; Malcolm PN
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jan; 59(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 28376634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative evaluation of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient values on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict higher Gleason score prostate cancer.
Kato S; Kamijima S; Inaoka T; Kamiya N; Sasai D; Terada H; Hiruta N; Suzuki H
Scand J Urol; 2018 Jun; 52(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 29939084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative MRI in the Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Xiao VG; Kresnanto J; Moses DA; Pather N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Jan; 59(1):255-296. PubMed ID: 37165923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The performance of PI-RADSv2 and quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting confirmatory prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of prostate cancer.
Nougaret S; Robertson N; Golia Pernicka J; Molinari N; Hötker AM; Ehdaie B; Sala E; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 28258355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using apparent diffusion coefficient values: impact of patient race and age.
Tamada T; Prabhu V; Li J; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jun; 42(6):1744-1751. PubMed ID: 28161826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate Cancer: Utility of Whole-Lesion Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Metrics for Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.
Rosenkrantz AB; Ream JM; Nolan P; Rusinek H; Deng FM; Taneja SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1208-14. PubMed ID: 26587927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiparametric MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Accuracy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Pepe P; D'Urso D; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M; Russo G; Sabini MG; Valastro LM; Galia A; Fraggetta F
In Vivo; 2017; 31(3):415-418. PubMed ID: 28438871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of ADC, T2 signal intensity, and a combination of both parameters to assess Gleason score and primary Gleason grades in patients with known prostate cancer.
Nowak J; Malzahn U; Baur AD; Reichelt U; Franiel T; Hamm B; Durmus T
Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 25505225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incremental value of high b value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3-T for prediction of extracapsular extension in patients with prostate cancer: preliminary experience.
Kido A; Tamada T; Sone T; Kanomata N; Miyaji Y; Yamamoto A; Ito K
Radiol Med; 2017 Mar; 122(3):228-238. PubMed ID: 27943099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of the Benign Central Zone of the Prostate: Comparison With Low- and High-Grade Prostate Cancer.
Gupta RT; Kauffman CR; Garcia-Reyes K; Palmeri ML; Madden JF; Polascik TJ; Rosenkrantz AB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 26204283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preoperative Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Using ADC and ADC Ratio in Determining Gleason Score.
Woo S; Kim SY; Cho JY; Kim SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 27077643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of DWI with quantitative ADC values in ovarian tumors: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance.
Pi S; Cao R; Qiang JW; Guo YH
Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1386-1394. PubMed ID: 29463093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in differentiating malignant from benign solid liver lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nalaini F; Shahbazi F; Mousavinezhad SM; Ansari A; Salehi M
Br J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 94(1123):20210059. PubMed ID: 34111960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does normalisation improve the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient values for prostate cancer assessment? A blinded independent-observer evaluation.
Rosenkrantz AB; Khalef V; Xu W; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Doshi AM
Clin Radiol; 2015 Sep; 70(9):1032-7. PubMed ID: 26126712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Intermediate-Risk 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer.
Rozenberg R; Thornhill RE; Flood TA; Hakim SW; Lim C; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):775-82. PubMed ID: 27003049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
