These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27562804)

  • 1. Symmetric Electrode Spanning Narrows the Excitation Patterns of Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.
    Luo X; Wu CC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 17(6):609-619. PubMed ID: 27562804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Excitation Patterns of Standard and Steered Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.
    Wu CC; Luo X
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 17(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 26691160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrode spanning with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.
    Wu CC; Luo X
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 15(6):1023-36. PubMed ID: 24865767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current steering with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.
    Wu CC; Luo X
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Apr; 14(2):213-31. PubMed ID: 23250685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.
    Bierer JA; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 20090533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of stimulus and recording parameters on spatial spread of excitation and masking patterns obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Stille LJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):679-92. PubMed ID: 20505513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Stille LJ
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):435-52. PubMed ID: 18344869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction in spread of excitation from current focusing at multiple cochlear locations in cochlear implant users.
    Padilla M; Landsberger DM
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():98-107. PubMed ID: 26778546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pitch ranking, electrode discrimination, and physiological spread-of-excitation using Cochlear's dual-electrode mode.
    Goehring JL; Neff DL; Baudhuin JL; Hughes ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):715-27. PubMed ID: 25096106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spread of excitation varies for different electrical pulse shapes and stimulation modes in cochlear implants.
    Undurraga JA; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):21-36. PubMed ID: 22583921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
    Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Scheperle RA; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 25658746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
    Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking.
    Cohen LT; Richardson LM; Saunders E; Cowan RS
    Hear Res; 2003 May; 179(1-2):72-87. PubMed ID: 12742240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peripheral and Central Contributions to Cortical Responses in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Scheperle RA; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):430-40. PubMed ID: 25658747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Novel Algorithm to Derive Spread of Excitation Based on Deconvolution.
    Biesheuvel JD; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):572-81. PubMed ID: 27015548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship among the physiologic channel interactions, spectral-ripple discrimination, and vowel identification in cochlear implant users.
    Won JH; Humphrey EL; Yeager KR; Martinez AA; Robinson CH; Mills KE; Johnstone PM; Moon IJ; Woo J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Nov; 136(5):2714-25. PubMed ID: 25373971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effect of Stimulus Polarity on the Relation Between Pitch Ranking and ECAP Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Spitzer ER; Choi S; Hughes ML
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 20(3):279-290. PubMed ID: 30706216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Physiological Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implants.
    Spitzer ER; Hughes ML
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):786-798. PubMed ID: 28972468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.