These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27562907)
1. Influence of tumor cell lines derived from different tissue on sonoporation efficiency under ultrasound microbubble treatment. Shi D; Guo L; Duan S; Shang M; Meng D; Cheng L; Li J Ultrason Sonochem; 2017 Sep; 38():598-603. PubMed ID: 27562907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast Cancer Cell Line Phenotype Affects Sonoporation Efficiency Under Optimal Ultrasound Microbubble Conditions. Qu N; Shi D; Shang M; Duan S; Guo L; Ning S; Li J Med Sci Monit; 2018 Dec; 24():9054-9062. PubMed ID: 30546004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound Imaging of Microbubble Activity during Sonoporation Pulse Sequences. Keller S; Bruce M; Averkiou MA Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 45(3):833-845. PubMed ID: 30638695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microbubble attenuation and destruction: are they involved in sonoporation efficiency? Escoffre JM; Novell A; Piron J; Zeghimi A; Doinikov A; Bouakaz A IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jan; 60(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 23287912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microbubble-induced sonoporation involved in ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection in vitro at low acoustic pressures. Qiu Y; Zhang C; Tu J; Zhang D J Biomech; 2012 May; 45(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 22498312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Theoretical study of microbubble dynamics in sonoporation. Yu H; Lin Z; Xu L; Liu D; Shen Y Ultrasonics; 2015 Aug; 61():136-44. PubMed ID: 25957067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Viability of endothelial cells after ultrasound-mediated sonoporation: Influence of targeting, oscillation, and displacement of microbubbles. van Rooij T; Skachkov I; Beekers I; Lattwein KR; Voorneveld JD; Kokhuis TJA; Bera D; Luan Y; van der Steen AFW; de Jong N; Kooiman K J Control Release; 2016 Sep; 238():197-211. PubMed ID: 27469471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiparameter prediction control of in vitro drug delivery into mycobacterium smegmatis induced by microbubble-enhanced sonoporation. Li F; Dong Y; Li G; Li Y; Du Y Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2020 Sep; 154():98-107. PubMed ID: 32659324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Optimization of acoustic parameters of microbubble-enhanced ultrasound sonoporation for augmenting tumor cell permeability in vivo]. Luo L; Wu F; Wang B; Xu T; Hu J; Sui Y Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1377-81. PubMed ID: 24067224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bleomycin delivery into cancer cells in vitro with ultrasound and SonoVue® or BR14® microbubbles. Lamanauskas N; Novell A; Escoffre JM; Venslauskas M; Satkauskas S; Bouakaz A J Drug Target; 2013 May; 21(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 23336182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nanodroplet-Vaporization-Assisted Sonoporation for Highly Effective Delivery of Photothermal Treatment. Liu WW; Liu SW; Liou YR; Wu YH; Yang YC; Wang CR; Li PC Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():24753. PubMed ID: 27094209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving ultrasound gene transfection efficiency by controlling ultrasound excitation of microbubbles. Fan Z; Chen D; Deng CX J Control Release; 2013 Sep; 170(3):401-13. PubMed ID: 23770009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The correlation between acoustic cavitation and sonoporation involved in ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection with polyethylenimine (PEI) in vitro. Qiu Y; Luo Y; Zhang Y; Cui W; Zhang D; Wu J; Zhang J; Tu J J Control Release; 2010 Jul; 145(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 20398711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficient Gene Delivery by Sonoporation Is Associated with Microbubble Entry into Cells and the Clathrin-Dependent Endocytosis Pathway. Delalande A; Leduc C; Midoux P; Postema M; Pichon C Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1913-26. PubMed ID: 25929996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability. Karshafian R; Bevan PD; Williams R; Samac S; Burns PN Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 May; 35(5):847-60. PubMed ID: 19110370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of sonoporation effect of liposomes and phospholipids-based microbubbles on cultured cell membrane]. Zhao YZ; Luo YK; Tang J; Zhang Y; Lin Q; Mei XG Yao Xue Xue Bao; 2006 Dec; 41(12):1176-9. PubMed ID: 17290616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New insights on the role of ROS in the mechanisms of sonoporation-mediated gene delivery. Escoffre JM; Campomanes P; Tarek M; Bouakaz A Ultrason Sonochem; 2020 Jun; 64():104998. PubMed ID: 32062534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanistic Insight into Sonoporation with Ultrasound-Stimulated Polymer Microbubbles. Helfield BL; Chen X; Qin B; Watkins SC; Villanueva FS Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2678-2689. PubMed ID: 28847500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microbubble sonodestruction rate as a metric to evaluate sonoporation efficiency. Tamosiūnas M; Jurkonis R; Mir LM; Lukosevicius A; Venslauskas MS; Satkauskas S J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Dec; 31(12):1993-2000. PubMed ID: 23197553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of low frequency and low intensity ultrasound combined with microbubbles on the sonoporation efficiency of MDA-MB-231 cells. Liu Q; Jiang J; Tang L; Chen M Ann Transl Med; 2020 Mar; 8(6):298. PubMed ID: 32355742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]