These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27563182)

  • 1. Effects of thermal fatigue on shear punch strength of tooth-colored restoratives.
    Melody FM; U-Jin YA; Natalie TW; Elizabeth TW; Chien JY
    J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 27563182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative hardness and modulus of tooth-colored restoratives: a depth-sensing microindentation study.
    Yap AU; Wang X; Wu X; Chung SM
    Biomaterials; 2004 May; 25(11):2179-85. PubMed ID: 14741633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of early water exposure on the strength of glass ionomer restoratives.
    Wang XY; Yap AU; Ngo HC
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 17024947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Compressive fatigue limit of four types of dental restorative materials.
    Chen S; Öhman C; Jefferies SR; Gray H; Xia W; Engqvist H
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():283-289. PubMed ID: 27085845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems.
    Francois P; Vennat E; Le Goff S; Ruscassier N; Attal JP; Dursun E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jun; 23(6):2599-2608. PubMed ID: 30317399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials.
    Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 15343162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative evaluation of microleakage and compressive strength of Ketac Molar, Giomer, Zirconomer, and Ceram-x: An in vitro study.
    Walia R; Jasuja P; Verma KG; Juneja S; Mathur A; Ahuja L
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(3):280-4. PubMed ID: 27461814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of food-simulating liquids on the shear punch strength of composite and polyacid-modified composite restoratives.
    Yap AU; Lee MK; Chung SM; Tsai KT; Lim CT
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 14531598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of G-Coat Plus on the mechanical properties of glass-ionomer cements.
    Bagheri R; Taha NA; Azar MR; Burrow MF
    Aust Dent J; 2013 Dec; 58(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 24320901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physico-mechanical properties of a fast-set highly viscous GIC restorative.
    Yap AU; Pek YS; Cheang P
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jan; 30(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12485377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of dietary solvents on strength of nanofill and ormocer composites.
    Yap AU; Lim LY; Yang TY; Ali A; Chung SM
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 15765968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the effect of storage media on hardness and shear punch strength of tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Bagheri R; Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
    Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 17993032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Luting Cements to Different Core Buildup Materials in Lactic Acid Buffer Solution.
    Patil SM; Kamble VB; Desai RG; Arabbi KC; Prakash V
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Aug; 9(8):ZC84-7. PubMed ID: 26436055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Methacrylate- and Silorane-based Composite Resin Bonded to Resin-Modified Glass-ionomer Containing Micro- and Nano-hydroxyapatite.
    Sharafeddin F; Moradian M; Motamedi M
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2016 Jun; 17(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 27284560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials.
    Almuammar MF; Schulman A; Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12049082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical properties and bond strength of glass-ionomer cements.
    Pereira LC; Nunes MC; Dibb RG; Powers JM; Roulet JF; Navarro MF
    J Adhes Dent; 2002; 4(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 12071632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of surface treatments of conventional glass-ionomer on shear bond strength to giomer.
    Kimyai S; Mohammadi N; Oskoee PA; Chaharom ME; Bahari M; Sadr A; Ahmadizenouz G
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2012 Nov; 9(6):700-5. PubMed ID: 23559944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suitability of a shear punch test for dental restorative materials.
    Nomoto R; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2001 Sep; 17(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 11445209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the shear bond strength in Giomer and resin-modified glass ionomer in class V lesions.
    Zavare D; Merrikh M; Akbari H
    Heliyon; 2023 Mar; 9(3):e14105. PubMed ID: 36915481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.