These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2756335)

  • 21. Hearing aid silicone impression material as a foreign body in the middle ear.
    Lee HM; Yi KI; Jung JH; Lee IW
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2017; 38(1):108-111. PubMed ID: 27751620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [In situ measurements for determining the effect of additional boring of the earmold].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K; Stecker M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1990 Jun; 69(6):337-40. PubMed ID: 2378662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of physical properties of light-curing and self-curing dental impression materials.
    Hsieh CC; Liu CC; Chen RS
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1994 Apr; 93(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 7914770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
    Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro study on the dimensional accuracy of selected materials for monophase elastic impression making.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Büchler A; Lauer HC; Hoffmann A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 11951807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prospective study of the microbiological flora of hearing aid moulds and the efficacy of current cleaning techniques.
    Ahmad N; Etheridge C; Farrington M; Baguley DM
    J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Feb; 121(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 17040598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of three types of earmoulds in elderly users of post-aural hearing aids.
    Meredith R; Thomas KJ; Callaghan DE; Stephens SD; Rayment AJ
    Br J Audiol; 1989 Aug; 23(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 2790309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of alginate and elastomeric impression materials.
    Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E
    Scand J Dent Res; 1989 Aug; 97(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 2678420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dimensional changes of dental impression materials by thermal changes.
    Kim KM; Lee JS; Kim KN; Shin SW
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2001 May; 58(3):217-20. PubMed ID: 11319734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Linear dimensional changes in addition curing silicone impression materials.
    Marcinak CF; Draughn RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1982 Apr; 47(4):411-3. PubMed ID: 6951042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development of a novel audiological clinical material.
    Okpojo AO; Braden M
    Biomaterials; 1993; 14(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 8425022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The external ear and the tympanic membrane. A three-dimensional study.
    Salvinelli F; Maurizi M; Calamita S; D'Alatri L; Capelli A; Carbone A
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 1842299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Earmoulds: some benefits from horn fitting.
    Burgess N; Brooks DN
    Br J Audiol; 1991 Oct; 25(5):309-15. PubMed ID: 1742557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two- and three-dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials: effects of storage time and moisture contamination.
    Chandran DT; Jagger DC; Jagger RG; Barbour ME
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2010; 20(5):243-9. PubMed ID: 21084736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Elastomeric impression materials: a comparison of accuracy of multiple pours.
    Kumar D; Madihalli AU; Reddy KR; Rastogi N; Pradeep NT
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jul; 12(4):272-8. PubMed ID: 22186862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of filler content and processing variables on dimensional accuracy of experimental composite inlay material.
    Razak AA; Harrison A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Apr; 77(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 9104710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
    Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative study of dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques using addition silicone impression material.
    Penaflor CF; Semacio RC; De Las Alas LT; Uy HG
    J Philipp Dent Assoc; 1998; 49(4):37-49. PubMed ID: 10202524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.