193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27564095)
1. Lexical tone recognition in noise in normal-hearing children and prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
Mao Y; Xu L
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S23-S30. PubMed ID: 27564095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
Goldsworthy RL; Delhorne LA; Braida LD; Reed CM
Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants and single-sided deafness.
Zhou X; Li H; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Yuan W
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S41-S48. PubMed ID: 27367147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
Bonnard D; Schwalje A; Gantz B; Choi I
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients.
Vandali AE; Dawson PW; Arora K
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S74-S85. PubMed ID: 27329178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Verbal learning and memory in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants.
Kronenberger WG; Henning SC; Ditmars AM; Roman AS; Pisoni DB
Int J Audiol; 2018 Oct; 57(10):746-754. PubMed ID: 29933710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.
Zhou N; Dong L; Dixon S
Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 389():107921. PubMed ID: 32097828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tone perception in Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants.
Li G; Soli SD; Zheng Y
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S49-S59. PubMed ID: 28532185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
Yang HI; Zeng FG
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech perception in Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants: A systematic review.
Chen Y; Wong LLN
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S7-S16. PubMed ID: 28296526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Musical pitch and lexical tone perception with cochlear implants.
Wang W; Zhou N; Xu L
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):270-8. PubMed ID: 21190394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers.
Chatterjee M; Zion DJ; Deroche ML; Burianek BA; Limb CJ; Goren AP; Kulkarni AM; Christensen JA
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():151-62. PubMed ID: 25448167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing speech perception in noise for 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.
Ching TY; Zhang VW; Flynn C; Burns L; Button L; Hou S; McGhie K; Van Buynder P
Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S70-S80. PubMed ID: 28687057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined spectral and temporal enhancement to improve cochlear-implant speech perception.
Bhattacharya A; Vandali A; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2951-60. PubMed ID: 22087923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech perception of sine-wave signals by children with cochlear implants.
Nittrouer S; Kuess J; Lowenstein JH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2811-22. PubMed ID: 25994709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adjustments of the amplitude mapping function: Sensitivity of cochlear implant users and effects on subjective preference and speech recognition.
Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Boymans M; van Dijk B; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):674-87. PubMed ID: 27447758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lexical tone perception with HiResolution and HiResolution 120 sound-processing strategies in pediatric Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
Han D; Liu B; Zhou N; Chen X; Kong Y; Liu H; Zheng Y; Xu L
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 19194297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA
Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
