291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27564095)
21. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA
Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Rate and onset cues can improve cochlear implant synthetic vowel recognition in noise.
Mc Laughlin M; Reilly RB; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1546-60. PubMed ID: 23464025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users.
Srinivasan AG; Padilla M; Shannon RV; Landsberger DM
Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():29-36. PubMed ID: 23467170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.
Li T; Fu QJ
Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):498-502. PubMed ID: 21696330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow.
Nittrouer S; Caldwell-Tarr A; Tarr E; Lowenstein JH; Rice C; Moberly AC
Int J Audiol; 2013 Aug; 52(8):513-25. PubMed ID: 23834373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mandarin lexical tone recognition in bimodal cochlear implant users.
Zhou Q; Bi J; Song H; Gu X; Liu B
Int J Audiol; 2020 Jul; 59(7):548-555. PubMed ID: 32302240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Mandarin Tone and Vowel Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Talker Variability and Bimodal Hearing.
Chang YP; Chang RY; Lin CY; Luo X
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 26752089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The use of cochlear's SCAN and wireless microphones to improve speech understanding in noise with the Nucleus6® CP900 processor.
De Ceulaer G; Pascoal D; Vanpoucke F; Govaerts PJ
Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):837-843. PubMed ID: 28695749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Lexical tone recognition in multi-talker babbles and steady-state noise by Mandarin-speaking children with unilateral cochlear implants or bimodal hearing.
Meng C; Guo Q; Lyu J; Jaquish A; Chen X; Xu L
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 182():112020. PubMed ID: 38964177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimizing the perception of soft speech and speech in noise with the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant system.
Holden LK; Reeder RM; Firszt JB; Finley CC
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):255-69. PubMed ID: 21275500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Relationship between tone perception and production in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
Zhou N; Huang J; Chen X; Xu L
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):499-506. PubMed ID: 23442566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
Carroll J; Tiaden S; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Availability of binaural cues for pediatric bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
Sheffield SW; Haynes DS; Wanna GB; Labadie RF; Gifford RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 25751696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.
Horn DL; Dudley DJ; Dedhia K; Nie K; Drennan WR; Won JH; Rubinstein JT; Werner LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):613. PubMed ID: 28147578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of speech recognition abilities in quiet and in noise: a comparison between self-administered home testing and testing in the clinic for adult cochlear implant users.
de Graaff F; Huysmans E; Merkus P; Theo Goverts S; Smits C
Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):872-880. PubMed ID: 30261772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of adaptive dynamic range optimization in adverse listening conditions for cochlear implants.
Ali H; Hazrati O; Tobey EA; Hansen JH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):EL242. PubMed ID: 25190428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
Winn MB; Moore AN
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Speech rate, rate-matching, and intelligibility in early-implanted cochlear implant users.
Freeman V; Pisoni DB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1043. PubMed ID: 28863583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
