These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27564382)

  • 1. Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter 'imo'.
    Matsumoto C; Yamao S; Nomoto H; Takada S; Okuyama S; Kimura S; Yamanaka K; Aihara M; Shimomura Y
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161974. PubMed ID: 27564382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of central visual sensitivity between monocular and binocular testing in advanced glaucoma patients using imo perimetry.
    Kumagai T; Shoji T; Yoshikawa Y; Mine I; Kanno J; Ishii H; Saito A; Ishikawa S; Kimura I; Shinoda K
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 104(11):1258-1534. PubMed ID: 32152139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of monocular sensitivities measured with and without occlusion using the head-mounted perimeter imo.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ayato Y; Shimomura Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210691. PubMed ID: 30653560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of head-mounted perimeter (imo
    Kimura T; Matsumoto C; Nomoto H
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2019; 13():501-513. PubMed ID: 30936681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement in the detection of chiasmal and postchiasmal visual field defects between imo binocular random single-eye test and Humphrey monocular test.
    Sakamoto M; Sawamura H; Aihara M; Goseki T; Ikeda T; Ishikawa H; Nakamura M
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 66(5):413-424. PubMed ID: 35972588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test-retest repeatability of the imo binocular random single-eye test and Humphrey monocular test in patients with glaucoma.
    Toyokuni H; Sakamoto M; Ueda K; Kurimoto T; Yamada-Nakanishi Y; Nakamura M
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2023 Sep; 67(5):578-589. PubMed ID: 37392238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Humphrey Field Analyzer and imo visual field test results in patients with glaucoma and pseudo-fixation loss.
    Goukon H; Hirasawa K; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shoji N
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224711. PubMed ID: 31697732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Sensitivity Disparity Between the Two Eyes on Pointwise Monocular Sensitivity Under Binocular Viewing in Patients With Glaucoma.
    Wakayama A; Nomoto H; Chiba Y; Matsumoto C; Kusaka S
    J Glaucoma; 2021 Jan; 30(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 33290308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison between binocular and monocular reading ability and its relation with central visual field sensitivity in glaucoma patients].
    Ishii M; Seki M; Harigai R; Abe H; Fukuchi T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Nov; 117(11):925-30. PubMed ID: 24397190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic visual fields of one-eyed observers.
    Good GW; Fogt N; Daum KM; Mitchell GL
    Optometry; 2005 May; 76(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 15884418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of imo and Humphrey field analyzer perimeters in glaucomatous eyes.
    Nakai Y; Bessho K; Shono Y; Taoka K; Nakai Y
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2021; 14(12):1882-1887. PubMed ID: 34926203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the Binocular Visual Field of Glaucoma Patients With an Adjustment for Ocular Dominance.
    Matsuura M; Hirasawa K; Yanagisawa M; Hirasawa H; Murata H; Sawamura H; Mayama C; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 57(7):3276-81. PubMed ID: 27327583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of Fixational Eye Movements With the Head-Mounted Perimeter Imo.
    Ishibashi T; Matsumoto C; Nomoto H; Tanabe F; Narita I; Ishibashi M; Okuyama S; Kayazawa T; Kimura S; Yamanaka K; Kusaka S
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Aug; 11(8):26. PubMed ID: 36018585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices.
    Asaoka R; Crabb DP; Yamashita T; Russell RA; Wang YX; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(9):7007-11. PubMed ID: 21810985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of head tilt on visual field testing with a head-mounted perimeter imo.
    Yamao S; Matsumoto C; Nomoto H; Numata T; Eura M; Yamashita M; Hashimoto S; Okuyama S; Kimura S; Yamanaka K; Chiba Y; Aihara M; Shimomura Y
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185240. PubMed ID: 28945777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Five-year forecasts of the Visual Field Index (VFI) with binocular and monocular visual fields.
    Asaoka R; Russell RA; Malik R; Garway-Heath DF; Crabb DP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 May; 251(5):1335-41. PubMed ID: 23224148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Threshold perimetry of each eye with both eyes open in patients with monocular functional (nonorganic) and organic vision loss.
    Martin TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):857-64. PubMed ID: 9645724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Novel Visual Field Screening Program for Glaucoma With a Head-Mounted Perimeter.
    Arai K; Nishijima E; Ogawa S; Hosaka D; Itoh Y; Noro T; Okude S; Okada S; Yoshikawa K; Nakano T
    J Glaucoma; 2023 Jun; 32(6):520-525. PubMed ID: 36847662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perimetric Comparison Between the IMOvifa and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Nishida T; Eslani M; Weinreb RN; Arias J; Vasile C; Mohammadzadeh V; Moghimi S
    J Glaucoma; 2023 Feb; 32(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 36223309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional visual outcomes of cataract extraction in monocular versus binocular patients.
    Pomberg ML; Miller KM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 138(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 15234291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.