178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27564436)
1. A Retrospective, Single-institution Review of Loop Ileostomy Reversal Outcomes.
Zhou P; Hrabe J; Byrn J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Aug; 62(8):22-33. PubMed ID: 27564436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stapled vs hand suture closure of loop ileostomy: a meta-analysis.
Gong J; Guo Z; Li Y; Gu L; Zhu W; Li J; Li N
Colorectal Dis; 2013; 15(10):e561-8. PubMed ID: 24033921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of purse-string skin closure in loop ileostomy reversals leads to lower wound infection rates--a single high-volume centre experience.
Habbe N; Hannes S; Liese J; Woeste G; Bechstein WO; Strey C
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Jun; 29(6):709-14. PubMed ID: 24407267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low complication rate after stoma closure. Consultants attended 90% of the operations.
Faunø L; Rasmussen C; Sloth KK; Sloth AM; Tøttrup A
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Aug; 14(8):e499-505. PubMed ID: 22340709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized clinical trial of short-term outcomes following purse-string versus conventional closure of ileostomy wounds.
Reid K; Pockney P; Pollitt T; Draganic B; Smith SR
Br J Surg; 2010 Oct; 97(10):1511-7. PubMed ID: 20575111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients.
Wong KS; Remzi FH; Gorgun E; Arrigain S; Church JM; Preen M; Fazio VW
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Feb; 48(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 15714246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conventional Linear versus Purse-string Skin Closure after Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Comparison of Wound Infection Rates and Operative Outcomes.
Lee JR; Kim YW; Sung JJ; Song OP; Kim HC; Lim CW; Cho GS; Jung JC; Shin EJ
J Korean Soc Coloproctol; 2011 Apr; 27(2):58-63. PubMed ID: 21602963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Ileostomy closure in a colorectal surgery unit. Comparative analysis of different techniques].
Vallribera Valls F; Villanueva Figueredo B; Jiménez Gómez LM; Espín Bassany E; Sánchez Martinez JL; Martí Gallostra M; Armengol Carrasco M
Cir Esp; 2014 Mar; 92(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 24412284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Morbi-mortality related to ileostomy and colostomy closure].
Bada-Yllán O; García-Osogobio S; Zárate X; Velasco L; Hoyos-Tello CM; Takahashi T
Rev Invest Clin; 2006; 58(6):555-60. PubMed ID: 17432286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of stapled versus handsewn loop ileostomy closure: a meta-analysis.
Leung TT; MacLean AR; Buie WD; Dixon E
J Gastrointest Surg; 2008 May; 12(5):939-44. PubMed ID: 18071833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Revisiting stapled and handsewn loop ileostomy closures: a large retrospective series.
Balik E; Eren T; Bugra D; Buyukuncu Y; Akyuz A; Yamaner S
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2011; 66(11):1935-41. PubMed ID: 22086525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure in people undergoing stoma reversal.
Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Maw A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 Mar; 3(3):CD014763. PubMed ID: 38470607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevalence of surgical site infection at the stoma site following four skin closure techniques: a retrospective cohort study.
Li LT; Brahmbhatt R; Hicks SC; Davila JA; Berger DH; Liang MK
Dig Surg; 2014; 31(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 24776653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stapled versus sutured gastrointestinal anastomoses in the trauma patient.
Brundage SI; Jurkovich GJ; Grossman DC; Tong WC; Mack CD; Maier RV
J Trauma; 1999 Sep; 47(3):500-7; discussion 507-8. PubMed ID: 10498304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors related to anastomotic dehiscence and mortality after terminal stomal closure in the management of patients with severe secondary peritonitis.
Martínez JL; Luque-de-León E; Andrade P
J Gastrointest Surg; 2008 Dec; 12(12):2110-8. PubMed ID: 18923877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. HAnd Suture Versus STApling for Closure of Loop Ileostomy (HASTA Trial): results of a multicenter randomized trial (DRKS00000040).
Löffler T; Rossion I; Bruckner T; Diener MK; Koch M; von Frankenberg M; Pochhammer J; Thomusch O; Kijak T; Simon T; Mihaljevic AL; Krüger M; Stein E; Prechtl G; Hodina R; Michal W; Strunk R; Henkel K; Bunse J; Jaschke G; Politt D; Heistermann HP; Fußer M; Lange C; Stamm A; Vosschulte A; Holzer R; Partecke LI; Burdzik E; Hug HM; Luntz SP; Kieser M; Büchler MW; Weitz J;
Ann Surg; 2012 Nov; 256(5):828-35; discussion 835-6. PubMed ID: 23095628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis of handsewn versus stapled reversal of loop ileostomy.
Markides GA; Wijetunga IU; Brown SR; Anwar S
ANZ J Surg; 2015 Apr; 85(4):217-24. PubMed ID: 24920298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Loop ileostomy reversal after colon and rectal surgery: a single institutional 5-year experience in 944 patients.
Luglio G; Pendlimari R; Holubar SD; Cima RR; Nelson H
Arch Surg; 2011 Oct; 146(10):1191-6. PubMed ID: 22006879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Hasegawa H; Radley S; Morton DG; Keighley MR
Ann Surg; 2000 Feb; 231(2):202-4. PubMed ID: 10674611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
