1422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27565040)
1. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mobile Phone Use in a Car-Following Situation: Impact on Time Headway and Effectiveness of Driver's Rear-End Risk Compensation Behavior via a Driving Simulator Study.
Chen Y; Fu R; Xu Q; Yuan W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 32092914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparative Study of Accident Risk Related to Speech-Based and Handheld Texting during a Sudden Braking Event in Urban Road Environments.
Fu R; Chen Y; Xu Q; Guo Y; Yuan W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32781529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An improved automated braking system for rear-end collisions: A study based on a driving simulator experiment.
Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K; Yang J; Xue Q
J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():416-427. PubMed ID: 35249623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
Shah D; Lee C
J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.
Haque MM; Washington S
Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():42-53. PubMed ID: 24129320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modelling braking behaviour of distracted young drivers in car-following interactions: A grouped random parameters duration model with heterogeneity-in-means.
Ali Y; Haque MM
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 185():107015. PubMed ID: 36889237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using perceptual cues for brake response to a lead vehicle: Comparing threshold and accumulator models of visual looming.
Xue Q; Markkula G; Yan X; Merat N
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():114-124. PubMed ID: 29929099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
Gao J; Davis GA
J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling rear-end collisions including the role of driver's visibility and light truck vehicles using a nested logit structure.
Abdel-Aty M; Abdelwahab H
Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):447-56. PubMed ID: 15003590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Crash probability estimation via quantifying driver hazard perception.
Li Y; Zheng Y; Wang J; Kodaka K; Li K
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():116-125. PubMed ID: 28595973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study.
Li X; Rakotonirainy A; Yan X
J Safety Res; 2019 Sep; 70():89-96. PubMed ID: 31848013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of safety measures on driver's speed behavior at pedestrian crossings.
Bella F; Silvestri M
Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Oct; 83():111-24. PubMed ID: 26253423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How does intersection field of view influence driving safety in an emergent situation?
Yan X; Zhang X; Xue Q
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():162-175. PubMed ID: 30036817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of mobile phone use on car-following behaviour of young drivers.
Saifuzzaman M; Haque MM; Zheng Z; Washington S
Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Sep; 82():10-9. PubMed ID: 26009990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Study on driver's active emergency response in dangerous traffic scenes based on driving simulator.
Ma S; Xu S; Song J; Wang K; Qin H; Wang R
Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(2):116-121. PubMed ID: 38019530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of looming and attention capture in drivers' braking responses.
Terry HR; Charlton SG; Perrone JA
Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1375-82. PubMed ID: 18606269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of heterogeneity of car-following behavior on rear-end crash risk.
Zhang J; Wang Y; Lu G
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():275-289. PubMed ID: 30802778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of peripheral transverse line markings on drivers' speed and headway choice and crash risk in car-following: A naturalistic observation study.
Ding N; Zhu S; Jiao N; Liu B
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105701. PubMed ID: 32823033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In-vehicle warnings for work zone and related rear-end collisions: A driving simulator experiment.
Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106768. PubMed ID: 35820314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
