These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27565416)

  • 1. A systematic quality assessment of Environmental Impact Statements in the oil and gas industry.
    Anifowose B; Lawler DM; van der Horst D; Chapman L
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Dec; 572():570-585. PubMed ID: 27565416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision framework for platform decommissioning in California.
    Bernstein BB
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Oct; 11(4):542-53. PubMed ID: 26259879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From declared asset retirement obligations to a decommissioning cost estimate for onshore crude oil fields in Nigeria.
    Afieroho EU; Patil SL; Dandekar A; Perkins R; Reynolds D
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 204(Pt 1):207-220. PubMed ID: 28881330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Including Health in Environmental Assessments of Major Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Documentary Analysis.
    Riley E; Harris P; Kent J; Sainsbury P; Lane A; Baum F
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Feb; 7(2):144-153. PubMed ID: 29524938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Management and control of microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) in the oil and gas industry-Overview and a North Sea case study.
    Skovhus TL; Eckert RB; Rodrigues E
    J Biotechnol; 2017 Aug; 256():31-45. PubMed ID: 28687514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating alternatives for decommissioning California's offshore oil and gas platforms.
    Bernstein BB
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Oct; 11(4):537-41. PubMed ID: 25914401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the quality of environmental impact statements in Ethiopia.
    Ebissa G; Debebe U; Worku H; Fetene A
    Heliyon; 2022 Dec; 8(12):e12438. PubMed ID: 36643316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review on risk assessment techniques for hydraulic fracturing water and produced water management implemented in onshore unconventional oil and gas production.
    Torres L; Yadav OP; Khan E
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 539():478-493. PubMed ID: 26386446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Including impacts of particulate emissions on marine ecosystems in life cycle assessment: the case of offshore oil and gas production.
    Veltman K; Huijbregts MA; Rye H; Hertwich EG
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2011 Oct; 7(4):678-86. PubMed ID: 21735543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multi-attribute decision analysis for decommissioning offshore oil and gas platforms.
    Henrion M; Bernstein B; Swamy S
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Oct; 11(4):594-609. PubMed ID: 26415010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A costing model for offshore decommissioning in California.
    Bressler A; Bernstein BB
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Oct; 11(4):554-63. PubMed ID: 25914378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Collating science-based evidence to inform public opinion on the environmental effects of marine drilling platforms in the Mediterranean Sea.
    Mangano MC; Sarà G
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Mar; 188():195-202. PubMed ID: 27984792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health Impact Assessments, Regulation, and the Unconventional Gas Industry in the UK: Exploiting Resources, Ideology, and Expertise?
    Watterson A; Dinan W
    New Solut; 2016 Feb; 25(4):480-512. PubMed ID: 26531123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emerging conservation challenges and prospects in an era of offshore hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation.
    Kark S; Brokovich E; Mazor T; Levin N
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1573-85. PubMed ID: 26219342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Evaluation of the Quality of Environmental Impact Assessment Reports in the Mobile Telecommunications Infrastructure Sector: The Case of Plateau State in Nigeria.
    Choji VD; Rampedi IT; Modley LS; Ifegbesan AP
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36231958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Offshore pipeline decommissioning: Scale and context.
    Rouse S; Hayes P; Davies IM; Wilding TA
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2018 Apr; 129(1):241-244. PubMed ID: 29680543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oil and gas infrastructure decommissioning in marine protected areas: System complexity, analysis and challenges.
    Burdon D; Barnard S; Boyes SJ; Elliott M
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2018 Oct; 135():739-758. PubMed ID: 30301093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human factors engineering in oil and gas--a review of industry guidance.
    Robb M; Miller G
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():752-62. PubMed ID: 22316811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Considerations in evaluating potential socioeconomic impacts of offshore platform decommissioning in California.
    Kruse SA; Bernstein B; Scholz AJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Oct; 11(4):572-83. PubMed ID: 25914391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The tip of the iceberg: Three case studies of spill risk assessments used in environmental impact statements.
    Lubetkin SC
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2020 Mar; 152():110613. PubMed ID: 32479268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.