These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27565534)

  • 21. Simultaneous perceptual and response biases on sequential face attractiveness judgments.
    Pegors TK; Mattar MG; Bryan PB; Epstein RA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Jun; 144(3):664-73. PubMed ID: 25867223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Miscalibrations in judgements of attractiveness with cosmetics.
    Jones AL; Kramer RS; Ward R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2060-8. PubMed ID: 24670156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What is typical is good: the influence of face typicality on perceived trustworthiness.
    Sofer C; Dotsch R; Wigboldus DH; Todorov A
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 26(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25512052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identifying cognitive preferences for attractive female faces: an event-related potential experiment using a study-test paradigm.
    Zhang Y; Kong F; Chen H; Jackson T; Han L; Meng J; Yang Z; Gao J; Najam ul Hasan A
    J Neurosci Res; 2011 Nov; 89(11):1887-93. PubMed ID: 21805493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Environmental convergence in facial preferences: a cross-group comparison of Asian Vietnamese, Czech Vietnamese, and Czechs.
    Pavlovič O; Fiala V; Kleisner K
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):550. PubMed ID: 33436663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Face inversion increases attractiveness.
    Leder H; Goller J; Forster M; Schlageter L; Paul MA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jul; 178():25-31. PubMed ID: 28554156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Back view of beauty: a bias in attractiveness judgment.
    Yonemura K; Ono F; Watanabe K
    Perception; 2013; 42(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 23678619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful.
    Swaddle JP; Cuthill IC
    Proc Biol Sci; 1995 Jul; 261(1360):111-6. PubMed ID: 7644543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of averageness and sexual dimorphism on the judgment of facial attractiveness.
    Komori M; Kawamura S; Ishihara S
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):862-9. PubMed ID: 19285521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Judging the health and attractiveness of female faces: is the most attractive level of facial adiposity also considered the healthiest?
    Coetzee V; Re D; Perrett DI; Tiddeman BP; Xiao D
    Body Image; 2011 Mar; 8(2):190-3. PubMed ID: 21354874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Beauty matters: social preferences in a three-person ultimatum game.
    Ma Q; Hu Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125806. PubMed ID: 25951138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Individual Aesthetic Preferences for Faces Are Shaped Mostly by Environments, Not Genes.
    Germine L; Russell R; Bronstad PM; Blokland GA; Smoller JW; Kwok H; Anthony SE; Nakayama K; Rhodes G; Wilmer JB
    Curr Biol; 2015 Oct; 25(20):2684-9. PubMed ID: 26441352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attractiveness, distinctiveness, and recognition of faces: attractive faces can be typical or distinctive but are not better recognized.
    Wickham LH; Morris PE
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(3):455-68. PubMed ID: 14503395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Different processes in attractiveness assessments for unattractive and highly attractive faces-The role of presentation duration and rotation.
    Stróżak P; Zielińska M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102946. PubMed ID: 31693937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of facial adiposity on attractiveness and perceived leadership ability.
    Re DE; Perrett DI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):676-86. PubMed ID: 23971489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modeling individual preferences reveals that face beauty is not universally perceived across cultures.
    Zhan J; Liu M; Garrod OGB; Daube C; Ince RAA; Jack RE; Schyns PG
    Curr Biol; 2021 May; 31(10):2243-2252.e6. PubMed ID: 33798430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Facial aesthetics: babies prefer attractiveness to symmetry.
    Samuels CA; Butterworth G; Roberts T; Graupner L; Hole G
    Perception; 2013; 42(11):1244-52. PubMed ID: 24601036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-western cultures: in search of biologically based standards of beauty.
    Rhodes G; Yoshikawa S; Clark A; Lee K; McKay R; Akamatsu S
    Perception; 2001; 30(5):611-25. PubMed ID: 11430245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Beauty is better pursued: effects of attractiveness in multiple-face tracking.
    Liu CH; Chen W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):553-64. PubMed ID: 22117090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Repeated exposure makes attractive faces more attractive: Neural responses in facial attractiveness judgement.
    Han S; Liu S; Gan Y; Xu Q; Xu P; Luo Y; Zhang L
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Mar; 139():107365. PubMed ID: 32001231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.