BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27565794)

  • 1. Yada: a novel tool for molecular docking calculations.
    Piotto S; Di Biasi L; Fino R; Parisi R; Sessa L; Concilio S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):753-759. PubMed ID: 27565794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated docking for novel drug discovery.
    Bello M; Martínez-Archundia M; Correa-Basurto J
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2013 Jul; 8(7):821-34. PubMed ID: 23642085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applications of the NRGsuite and the Molecular Docking Software FlexAID in Computational Drug Discovery and Design.
    Morency LP; Gaudreault F; Najmanovich R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():367-388. PubMed ID: 29594781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fully Blind Peptide-Protein Docking with pepATTRACT.
    Schindler CEM; de Vries SJ; Zacharias M
    Structure; 2015 Aug; 23(8):1507-1515. PubMed ID: 26146186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple grid arrangement improves ligand docking with unknown binding sites: Application to the inverse docking problem.
    Ban T; Ohue M; Akiyama Y
    Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Apr; 73():139-146. PubMed ID: 29482137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.
    Cournia Z; Allen B; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2911-2937. PubMed ID: 29243483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advancements in Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations Towards Ligand-receptor Interactions and Structure-function Relationships.
    Naqvi AAT; Mohammad T; Hasan GM; Hassan MI
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2018; 18(20):1755-1768. PubMed ID: 30360721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Negative Image-Based Rescoring: Using Cavity Information to Improve Docking Screening.
    Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():141-154. PubMed ID: 33759125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Docking techniques in pharmacology: How much promising?
    Gupta M; Sharma R; Kumar A
    Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Oct; 76():210-217. PubMed ID: 30067954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Li Q; Shah S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1558():111-124. PubMed ID: 28150235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Search strategies and evaluation in protein-protein docking: principles, advances and challenges.
    Huang SY
    Drug Discov Today; 2014 Aug; 19(8):1081-96. PubMed ID: 24594385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ProSelection: A Novel Algorithm to Select Proper Protein Structure Subsets for in Silico Target Identification and Drug Discovery Research.
    Wang N; Wang L; Xie XQ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Nov; 57(11):2686-2698. PubMed ID: 29016123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting protein-ligand binding modes for CELPP and GC3: workflows and insight.
    Xu X; Ma Z; Duan R; Zou X
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Mar; 33(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 30689079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing inhomogeneous solvation theory in structure-based ligand discovery.
    Balius TE; Fischer M; Stein RM; Adler TB; Nguyen CN; Cruz A; Gilson MK; Kurtzman T; Shoichet BK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Aug; 114(33):E6839-E6846. PubMed ID: 28760952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
    Cleves AE; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binding Mode Prediction and Virtual Screening Applications by Covalent Docking.
    Scarpino A; Ferenczy GG; Keserű GM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():73-88. PubMed ID: 33759121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using reverse docking for target identification and its applications for drug discovery.
    Lee A; Lee K; Kim D
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2016 Jul; 11(7):707-15. PubMed ID: 27186904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GalaxySite: ligand-binding-site prediction by using molecular docking.
    Heo L; Shin WH; Lee MS; Seok C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Jul; 42(Web Server issue):W210-4. PubMed ID: 24753427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
    Ding F; Dokholyan NV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.