738 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27565797)
1. Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations.
Misini Ignjatović M; Caldararu O; Dong G; Muñoz-Gutierrez C; Adasme-Carreño F; Ryde U
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):707-730. PubMed ID: 27565797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blinded predictions of binding modes and energies of HSP90-α ligands for the 2015 D3R grand challenge.
Mey ASJS; Juárez-Jiménez J; Hennessy A; Michel J
Bioorg Med Chem; 2016 Oct; 24(20):4890-4899. PubMed ID: 27485604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3.
He X; Man VH; Ji B; Xie XQ; Wang J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 30218199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting binding poses and affinities for protein - ligand complexes in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge using a physical model with a statistical parameter estimation.
Grudinin S; Kadukova M; Eisenbarth A; Marillet S; Cazals F
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):791-804. PubMed ID: 27718029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Binding affinities of the farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 estimated by free-energy perturbation and docking.
Olsson MA; García-Sosa AT; Ryde U
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):211-224. PubMed ID: 28879536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving binding mode and binding affinity predictions of docking by ligand-based search of protein conformations: evaluation in D3R grand challenge 2015.
Xu X; Yan C; Zou X
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Aug; 31(8):689-699. PubMed ID: 28668990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.
Gathiaka S; Liu S; Chiu M; Yang H; Stuckey JA; Kang YN; Delproposto J; Kubish G; Dunbar JB; Carlson HA; Burley SK; Walters WP; Amaro RE; Feher VA; Gilson MK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):651-668. PubMed ID: 27696240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimates of ligand-binding affinities supported by quantum mechanical methods.
Söderhjelm P; Kongsted J; Genheden S; Ryde U
Interdiscip Sci; 2010 Mar; 2(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 20640794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using physics-based pose predictions and free energy perturbation calculations to predict binding poses and relative binding affinities for FXR ligands in the D3R Grand Challenge 2.
Athanasiou C; Vasilakaki S; Dellis D; Cournia Z
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 29119352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binding free energies in the SAMPL5 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with DFT-D3 and CCSD(T).
Caldararu O; Olsson MA; Riplinger C; Neese F; Ryde U
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):87-106. PubMed ID: 27600554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Binding free energies in the SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with MM and QM methods.
Caldararu O; Olsson MA; Misini Ignjatović M; Wang M; Ryde U
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1027-1046. PubMed ID: 30203229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of affinity ranking using AutoDock-GPU and MM-GBSA scores for BACE-1 inhibitors in the D3R Grand Challenge 4.
El Khoury L; Santos-Martins D; Sasmal S; Eberhardt J; Bianco G; Ambrosio FA; Solis-Vasquez L; Koch A; Forli S; Mobley DL
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Dec; 33(12):1011-1020. PubMed ID: 31691919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accurate predictions of nonpolar solvation free energies require explicit consideration of binding-site hydration.
Genheden S; Mikulskis P; Hu L; Kongsted J; Söderhjelm P; Ryde U
J Am Chem Soc; 2011 Aug; 133(33):13081-92. PubMed ID: 21728337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interaction with specific HSP90 residues as a scoring function: validation in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Santos-Martins D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):731-742. PubMed ID: 27549813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. D3R Grand Challenge 4: ligand similarity and MM-GBSA-based pose prediction and affinity ranking for BACE-1 inhibitors.
Sasmal S; El Khoury L; Mobley DL
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Feb; 34(2):163-177. PubMed ID: 31781990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Molecular docking performance evaluated on the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 drug-like ligand datasets.
Selwa E; Martiny VY; Iorga BI
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):829-839. PubMed ID: 27699554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving ligand 3D shape similarity-based pose prediction with a continuum solvent model.
Kumar A; Zhang KYJ
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Dec; 33(12):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 31463704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Kumar A; Zhang KY
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):685-693. PubMed ID: 27484214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Develop and test a solvent accessible surface area-based model in conformational entropy calculations.
Wang J; Hou T
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1199-212. PubMed ID: 22497310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
