250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27566911)
1. A Bayesian perspective on delusions: Suggestions for modifying two reasoning tasks.
Pfuhl G
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Sep; 56():4-11. PubMed ID: 27566911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How delusion is formed?
Park JS; Kang UG
Med Hypotheses; 2016 Feb; 87():61-5. PubMed ID: 26826642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. I want to believe: delusion, motivated reasoning, and Bayesian decision theory.
Rigoli F; Martinelli C; Pezzulo G
Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2021 Nov; 26(6):408-420. PubMed ID: 34558392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Etiopathogeny of the delusion of pregnancy using a literature review: Role of hyperprolactinemia and application of the theory of abductive inference].
Levy F; Mouchabac S; Peretti CS
Encephale; 2014 Apr; 40(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 23830681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The erotetic theory of delusional thinking.
Parrott M; Koralus P
Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2015; 20(5):398-415. PubMed ID: 26367790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Beads task vs. box task: The specificity of the jumping to conclusions bias.
Balzan RP; Ephraums R; Delfabbro P; Andreou C
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Sep; 56():42-50. PubMed ID: 27568886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The formation of maintenance of delusions: a Bayesian analysis.
Hemsley DR; Garety PA
Br J Psychiatry; 1986 Jul; 149():51-6. PubMed ID: 3779313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian accounts and black swans: Questioning the erotetic theory of delusional thinking.
McKay R
Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2015; 20(5):456-66. PubMed ID: 26372015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A generative framework for the study of delusions.
Erdmann T; Mathys C
Schizophr Res; 2022 Jul; 245():42-49. PubMed ID: 33648810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abductive inference and delusional belief.
Coltheart M; Menzies P; Sutton J
Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2010 Jan; 15(1):261-87. PubMed ID: 20017038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hierarchical Bayesian models of delusion.
Williams D
Conscious Cogn; 2018 May; 61():129-147. PubMed ID: 29602712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Belief-bias reasoning in non-clinical delusion-prone individuals.
Anandakumar T; Connaughton E; Coltheart M; Langdon R
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Sep; 56():71-78. PubMed ID: 28318497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The contribution of hypersalience to the "jumping to conclusions" bias associated with delusions in schizophrenia.
Speechley WJ; Whitman JC; Woodward TS
J Psychiatry Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 35(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 20040242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian modelling of Jumping-to-Conclusions bias in delusional patients.
Moutoussis M; Bentall RP; El-Deredy W; Dayan P
Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2011 Sep; 16(5):422-47. PubMed ID: 21480015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analytic cognitive style predicts paranormal explanations of anomalous experiences but not the experiences themselves: Implications for cognitive theories of delusions.
Ross RM; Hartig B; McKay R
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Sep; 56():90-96. PubMed ID: 27692466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Everything is connected: Inference and attractors in delusions.
Adams RA; Vincent P; Benrimoh D; Friston KJ; Parr T
Schizophr Res; 2022 Jul; 245():5-22. PubMed ID: 34384664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Jumping to conclusions and the continuum of delusional beliefs.
Warman DM; Lysaker PH; Martin JM; Davis L; Haudenschield SL
Behav Res Ther; 2007 Jun; 45(6):1255-69. PubMed ID: 17052687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Bayesian model of the jumping-to-conclusions bias and its relationship to psychopathology.
Tan N; Shou Y; Chen J; Christensen BK
Cogn Emot; 2024 May; 38(3):315-331. PubMed ID: 38078381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis.
Sterzer P; Adams RA; Fletcher P; Frith C; Lawrie SM; Muckli L; Petrovic P; Uhlhaas P; Voss M; Corlett PR
Biol Psychiatry; 2018 Nov; 84(9):634-643. PubMed ID: 30007575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reasoning heuristics across the psychosis continuum: the contribution of hypersalient evidence-hypothesis matches.
Balzan R; Delfabbro P; Galletly C; Woodward T
Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2012; 17(5):431-50. PubMed ID: 22384982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
