These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27567146)

  • 21. A tutorial on assessing statistical power and determining sample size for structural equation models.
    Jobst LJ; Bader M; Moshagen M
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Feb; 28(1):207-221. PubMed ID: 34672644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Meta analytical structural equation modeling: comments on issues with current methods and viable alternatives.
    Yuan KH
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):215-31. PubMed ID: 27286905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analyzing dyadic data with multilevel modeling versus structural equation modeling: A tale of two methods.
    Ledermann T; Kenny DA
    J Fam Psychol; 2017 Jun; 31(4):442-452. PubMed ID: 28165269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [An approach to solving the problem of missing data: identifying and dealing with mechanisms adequately].
    Cho A; Leonhart R
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2013 Aug; 52(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 23233334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mediational analysis in HIV/AIDS research: estimating multivariate path analytic models in a structural equation modeling framework.
    Bryan A; Schmiege SJ; Broaddus MR
    AIDS Behav; 2007 May; 11(3):365-83. PubMed ID: 16917669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Statistical practices: the seven deadly sins.
    Millis S
    Child Neuropsychol; 2003 Sep; 9(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 13680411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research.
    MacCallum RC; Austin JT
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2000; 51():201-26. PubMed ID: 10751970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Maximum likelihood estimation in meta-analytic structural equation modeling.
    Oort FJ; Jak S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 27286901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Some reflections on combining meta-analysis and structural equation modeling.
    Cheung MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 30175903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The multiple imputation method: a case study involving secondary data analysis.
    Walani SR; Cleland CM
    Nurse Res; 2015 May; 22(5):13-9. PubMed ID: 25976532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of sample size and testing power (Part 1).
    Hu LP; Bao XL; Zhou SG; Guan X; Xin HL
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2011 Oct; 9(10):1070-4. PubMed ID: 22015187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. semPower: General power analysis for structural equation models.
    Moshagen M; Bader M
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):2901-2922. PubMed ID: 37950114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Statistical issues in periodontal research.
    DeRouen TA; Hujoel PP; Mancl LA
    J Dent Res; 1995 Nov; 74(11):1731-7. PubMed ID: 8530733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improving measurement in health education and health behavior research using item response modeling: introducing item response modeling.
    Wilson M; Allen DD; Li JC
    Health Educ Res; 2006 Dec; 21 Suppl 1():i4-18. PubMed ID: 17018765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Special issue on meta-analytic structural equation modeling: introduction from the guest editors.
    Cheung MW; Hafdahl AR
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 27286898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the statistical power for multiple tests: a case study.
    Yeo A; Qu Y
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 18381588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Structural equation modeling: a primer for health behavior researchers.
    Buhi ER; Goodson P; Neilands TB
    Am J Health Behav; 2007; 31(1):74-85. PubMed ID: 17181464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Implementing type I & type II error spending for two-sided group sequential designs.
    Rudser KD; Emerson SS
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 May; 29(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 17933592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation.
    Preacher KJ; Zyphur MJ; Zhang Z
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):209-33. PubMed ID: 20822249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of structural equation and multidimensional Rasch modeling approaches to Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
    Wolfe EW; Singh K
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(3):212-21. PubMed ID: 22357124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.