These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27567237)

  • 1. The anchor integration model: A descriptive model of anchoring effects.
    Turner BM; Schley DR
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Nov; 90():1-47. PubMed ID: 27567237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When "bad" is good: How evaluative judgments eliminate the standard anchoring effect.
    Schweickart O; Tam C; Brown NR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Mar; 75(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 32597668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Similarity, multiple estimations, and the anchoring effect.
    Sailors JJ; Heyman JE
    J Gen Psychol; 2019; 146(2):200-215. PubMed ID: 30739604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anchoring and Judgment Bias: Disregarding Under Uncertainty.
    Berg SA; Moss JH
    Psychol Rep; 2022 Oct; 125(5):2688-2708. PubMed ID: 34039105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anchoring effect in legal decision-making: A meta-analysis.
    Bystranowski P; Janik B; Próchnicki M; Skórska P
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Feb; 45(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 33734746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling choice and valuation in decision experiments.
    Loomes G
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):902-24. PubMed ID: 20658857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of accuracy motivation and anchoring on metacomprehension judgment and accuracy.
    Zhao Q
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(3):155-74. PubMed ID: 24837018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive decision making in a dynamic environment: a test of a sequential sampling model of relative judgment.
    Vuckovic A; Kwantes PJ; Neal A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Sep; 19(3):266-84. PubMed ID: 24059826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Academic judgments under uncertainty: A study of collective anchoring effects in Swedish Research Council panel groups.
    Roumbanis L
    Soc Stud Sci; 2017 Feb; 47(1):95-116. PubMed ID: 28195028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values.
    Chapman GB; Johnson EJ
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Aug; 79(2):115-153. PubMed ID: 10433900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual and Cognitive Judgments Show Both Anchoring and Repulsion.
    Spicer J; Zhu JQ; Chater N; Sanborn AN
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Sep; 33(9):1395-1407. PubMed ID: 35876741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interference effects of choice on confidence: Quantum characteristics of evidence accumulation.
    Kvam PD; Pleskac TJ; Yu S; Busemeyer JR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Aug; 112(34):10645-50. PubMed ID: 26261322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anchoring in Numeric Judgments of Visual Stimuli.
    Langeborg L; Eriksson M
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():225. PubMed ID: 26941684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One-reason decision making unveiled: a measurement model of the recognition heuristic.
    Hilbig BE; Erdfelder E; Pohl RF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):123-134. PubMed ID: 20053049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Experimental Study on Anchoring Effect of Consumers' Price Judgment Based on Consumers' Experiencing Scenes.
    Zong Y; Guo X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():794135. PubMed ID: 35211062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age similarities in the anchoring effect in emotion intensity judgment.
    Jin M; Peng H; Wang D
    BMC Psychol; 2023 May; 11(1):158. PubMed ID: 37189205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are adjustments insufficient?
    Epley N; Gilovich T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Apr; 30(4):447-60. PubMed ID: 15070474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anchoring effects in the judgment of confidence: semantic or numeric priming?
    Carroll SR; Petrusic WM; Leth-Steensen C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19304619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive Anchoring Model: How Static and Dynamic Presentations of Time Series Influence Judgments and Predictions.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Tsaneva-Atanasova K; Juliusson A; Chater N
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 42(1):77-102. PubMed ID: 28382639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post choice information integration as a causal determinant of confidence: Novel data and a computational account.
    Moran R; Teodorescu AR; Usher M
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 May; 78():99-147. PubMed ID: 25868113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.