427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27567534)
1. Quantitative cardiotocography to improve fetal assessment during labor: a preliminary randomized controlled trial.
Ignatov PN; Lutomski JE
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():91-7. PubMed ID: 27567534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Indirect standard cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus indirect quantitative cardiotocography--a randomized comparative study in intrapartum monitoring].
Ignatov P; Atanasov B
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2012; 51(5):3-10. PubMed ID: 23234029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Central Fetal Monitoring With and Without Computer Analysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Nunes I; Ayres-de-Campos D; Ugwumadu A; Amin P; Banfield P; Nicoll A; Cunningham S; Sousa P; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J;
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 129(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 27926647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
Timonen S; Holmberg K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal pulse oximetry and wavelet analysis of the fetal heart rate in the evaluation of abnormal cardiotocography tracings.
Salamalekis E; Siristatidis C; Vasios G; Saloum J; Giannaris D; Chrelias C; Prentza A; Koutsouris D
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Apr; 32(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 16594915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification of cases with adverse neonatal outcome monitored by cardiotocography versus ST analysis: secondary analysis of a randomized trial.
Westerhuis ME; Porath MM; Becker JH; Van Den Akker ES; Van Beek E; Van Dessel HJ; Drogtrop AP; Van Geijn HP; Graziosi GC; Groenendaal F; Van Lith JM; Mol BW; Moons KG; Nijhuis JG; Oei SG; Oosterbaan HP; Rijnders RJ; Schuitemaker NW; Wijnberger LD; Willekes C; Wouters MG; Visser GH; Kwee A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Jul; 91(7):830-7. PubMed ID: 22536843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Admission tests other than cardiotocography for fetal assessment during labour.
Khunpradit S; Lumbiganon P; Laopaiboon M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Jun; 2011(6):CD008410. PubMed ID: 21678377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. STAN S21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: an observational study in 637 patients.
Kwee A; van der Hoorn-van den Beld CW; Veerman J; Dekkers AH; Visser GH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 15280112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomised clinical trial of intrapartum fetal monitoring with computer analysis and alerts versus previously available monitoring.
Ayres-de-Campos D; Ugwumadu A; Banfield P; Lynch P; Amin P; Horwell D; Costa A; Santos C; Bernardes J; Rosen K
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2010 Oct; 10():71. PubMed ID: 21029466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial.
Amer-Wåhlin I; Hellsten C; Norén H; Hagberg H; Herbst A; Kjellmer I; Lilja H; Lindoff C; Månsson M; Mårtensson L; Olofsson P; Sundström A; Marsál K
Lancet; 2001 Aug; 358(9281):534-8. PubMed ID: 11520523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intrapartum cardiotocography with and without computer analysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Campanile M; D'Alessandro P; Della Corte L; Saccone G; Tagliaferri S; Arduino B; Esposito G; Esposito FG; Raffone A; Signorini MG; Magenes G; Di Tommaso M; Xodo S; Zullo F; Berghella V
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jul; 33(13):2284-2290. PubMed ID: 30449222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomised clinical trial on cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus cardiotocography plus ST-analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (STAN) for intrapartum monitoring.
Westerhuis ME; Moons KG; van Beek E; Bijvoet SM; Drogtrop AP; van Geijn HP; van Lith JM; Mol BW; Nijhuis JG; Oei SG; Porath MM; Rijnders RJ; Schuitemaker NW; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Willekes C; Kwee A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Jul; 7():13. PubMed ID: 17655764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Routine use of ST-segment of fetal electrocardiogram for monitoring labor. A year's experience (preliminary results)].
Haberstich R; Vayssière C; David E; Sebahoun V; Schmitt B; Langer B; Nisand I
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 Oct; 31(10):820-6. PubMed ID: 14642938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Delay in intervention increases neonatal morbidity in births monitored with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis.
Kessler J; Moster D; Albrechtsen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Feb; 93(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 24251909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography--a randomised controlled study.
Ojala K; Vääräsmäki M; Mäkikallio K; Valkama M; Tekay A
BJOG; 2006 Apr; 113(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 16553653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Swedish randomized controlled trial of cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram revisited: analysis of data according to standard versus modified intention-to-treat principle.
Amer-Wåhlin I; Kjellmer I; Maršál K; Olofsson P; Rosén KG
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Sep; 90(9):990-6. PubMed ID: 21623743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cardiotocography alone vs. cardiotocography with ST segment analysis for intrapartum fetal monitoring in women with late-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial.
Puertas A; Góngora J; Valverde M; Revelles L; Manzanares S; Carrillo MP
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Mar; 234():213-217. PubMed ID: 30731334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ST waveform analysis vs cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Blix E; Brurberg KG; Reierth E; Reinar LM; Øian P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Mar; 103(3):437-448. PubMed ID: 38093630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography.
Galazios G; Tripsianis G; Tsikouras P; Koutlaki N; Liberis V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Feb; 281(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 19455348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the value of intrapartum fetal scalp blood sampling to predict adverse neonatal outcomes: A UK multicentre observational study.
Al Wattar BH; Lakhiani A; Sacco A; Siddharth A; Bain A; Calvia A; Kamran A; Tiong B; Warwick B; MacMahon C; Marcus D; Long E; Coyle G; Lever GE; Michel G; Gopal G; Baig H; Price HL; Badri H; Stevenson H; Hoyte H; Malik H; Edwards J; Hartley J; Hemers J; Tamblyn J; Dalton JAW; Frost J; Subba K; Baxter K; Sivakumar K; Murphy K; Papadakis K; Bladon LR; Kasaven L; Manning L; Prior M; Ghosh M; Couch M; Altunel M; Pearce M; Cocker M; Stephanou M; Jie M; Mistry M; Wahby MO; Saidi NS; Ramshaw NL; Tempest N; Parker N; Tan PL; Johnson RL; Harris R; Tildesley R; Ram R; Painuly R; Cuffolo R; Bugeja R; Ngadze R; Grainger R; Gurung S; Mak S; Farrell S; Cowey S; Neary S; Quinn S; Nijjar SK; Kenyon S; Lamb S; Tracey S; Lee T; Kinsella T; Davidson T; Corr T; Sampson U; McQueen V; Smith WP; Castling Z;
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():62-67. PubMed ID: 31229725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
