BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27568414)

  • 1. Do maternal pushing techniques during labour affect obstetric or neonatal outcomes?
    Barasinski C; Lemery D; Vendittelli F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2016 Oct; 44(10):578-583. PubMed ID: 27568414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of spontaneous pushing versus Valsalva pushing in the second stage of labour on mother and fetus: a systematic review of randomised trials.
    Prins M; Boxem J; Lucas C; Hutton E
    BJOG; 2011 May; 118(6):662-70. PubMed ID: 21392242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of the type of maternal pushing during the second stage of labour on obstetric and neonatal outcome: a multicentre randomised trial-the EOLE study protocol.
    Barasinski C; Vendittelli F
    BMJ Open; 2016 Dec; 6(12):e012290. PubMed ID: 27998899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods of pushing during vaginal delivery and pelvic floor and perineal outcomes: a review.
    de Tayrac R; Letouzey V
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 28(6):470-476. PubMed ID: 27749356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Methods of pushing at vaginal delivery and pelvi-perineal consequences. Review].
    Ratier N; Balenbois E; Letouzey V; Marès P; de Tayrac R
    Prog Urol; 2015 Mar; 25(4):180-7. PubMed ID: 25649356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes between delayed and immediate pushing in the second stage of vaginal delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Szu LT; Chou PY; Lin PH; Chen C; Lin WL; Chen KH
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Feb; 303(2):481-499. PubMed ID: 32990782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Pushing technique in the expulsive phase of labor. A randomized study].
    Parnell JC; Langhoff-Roos J; Iversen R; Damgaard P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Jul; 155(29):2259-62. PubMed ID: 8328095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maternal and neonatal outcomes from a comparison of spontaneous and directed pushing in second stage.
    Lee N; Gao Y; Lotz L; Kildea S
    Women Birth; 2019 Aug; 32(4):e433-e440. PubMed ID: 30377072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is directed open-glottis pushing more effective than directed closed-glottis pushing during the second stage of labor? A pragmatic randomized trial - the EOLE study.
    Barasinski C; Debost-Legrand A; Vendittelli F
    Midwifery; 2020 Dec; 91():102843. PubMed ID: 32992159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of pushing techniques in birth on mother and fetus: a randomized study.
    Yildirim G; Beji NK
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 18307484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alternative to intensive management of the active phase of the second stage of labor: a multicenter randomized trial (Phase Active du Second STade trial) among nulliparous women with an epidural.
    Le Ray C; Rozenberg P; Kayem G; Harvey T; Sibiude J; Doret M; Parant O; Fuchs F; Vardon D; Azria E; Sénat MV; Ceccaldi PF; Seco A; Garabedian C; Chantry AA;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 227(4):639.e1-639.e15. PubMed ID: 35868416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of flexible sacrum positions during the second stage of labour on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zang Y; Lu H; Zhao Y; Huang J; Ren L; Li X
    J Clin Nurs; 2020 Sep; 29(17-18):3154-3169. PubMed ID: 32531856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of pushing techniques during the second stage of labor: A randomized controlled trial.
    Koyucu RG; Demirci N
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 56(5):606-612. PubMed ID: 29037544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized trial of coached versus uncoached maternal pushing during the second stage of labor.
    Bloom SL; Casey BM; Schaffer JI; McIntire DD; Leveno KJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 194(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 16389004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based labor management: second stage of labor (part 4).
    Gimovsky AC; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Mar; 4(2):100548. PubMed ID: 34871779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Delayed versus immediate pushing in the second stage of labor in women with neuraxial analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Di Mascio D; Saccone G; Bellussi F; Al-Kouatly HB; Brunelli R; Benedetti Panici P; Liberati M; D'Antonio F; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):189-203. PubMed ID: 32067972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maternal outcomes using delayed pushing versus immediate pushing in the second stage of labour: An umbrella review.
    Deusa-López P; Cuenca-Martínez F; Sánchez-Martínez V; Sempere-Rubio N
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2024 Apr; 152():104693. PubMed ID: 38262232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How can second-stage management prevent perineal trauma? Critical review.
    Flynn P; Franiek J; Janssen P; Hannah WJ; Klein MC
    Can Fam Physician; 1997 Jan; 43():73-84. PubMed ID: 9626426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immediate compared with delayed pushing in the second stage of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tuuli MG; Frey HA; Odibo AO; Macones GA; Cahill AG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 120(3):660-8. PubMed ID: 22872146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neonatal outcomes of deliveries in occiput posterior position when delayed pushing is practiced: a cohort study.
    Dahlqvist K; Jonsson M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Nov; 17(1):377. PubMed ID: 29137599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.