383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27568883)
61. Reliability and measurement error of 3-dimensional regional lumbar motion measures: a systematic review.
Mieritz RM; Bronfort G; Kawchuk G; Breen A; Hartvigsen J
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2012 Oct; 35(8):645-56. PubMed ID: 23158469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Research progress of diagnosing methodology for lumbar segmental instability: A narrative review.
Wang Y; Huang K
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jan; 101(1):e28534. PubMed ID: 35029921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The clinimetric qualities of patient-assessed instruments for measuring chronic ankle instability: a systematic review.
Eechaute C; Vaes P; Van Aerschot L; Asman S; Duquet W
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Jan; 8():6. PubMed ID: 17233912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine.
Luomajoki H; Kool J; de Bruin ED; Airaksinen O
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Sep; 8():90. PubMed ID: 17850669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Are diagnostic criteria for general joint hypermobility and benign joint hypermobility syndrome based on reproducible and valid tests? A review of the literature.
Remvig L; Jensen DV; Ward RC
J Rheumatol; 2007 Apr; 34(4):798-803. PubMed ID: 17295436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.
Kantor J
JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Jan; 153(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27806156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Reproducible Measurements of Muscle Characteristics Using the MyotonPRO Device: Comparison Between Individuals With and Without Paratonia.
Van Deun B; Hobbelen JSM; Cagnie B; Van Eetvelde B; Van Den Noortgate N; Cambier D
J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2018; 41(4):194-203. PubMed ID: 28005829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. An update of the systematic appraisal of the accuracy and utility of lumbar discography in chronic low back pain.
Manchikanti L; Benyamin RM; Singh V; Falco FJ; Hameed H; Derby R; Wolfer LR; Helm S; Calodney AK; Datta S; Snook LT; Caraway DL; Hirsch JA; Cohen SP
Pain Physician; 2013 Apr; 16(2 Suppl):SE55-95. PubMed ID: 23615887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Eligibility of the movement-based classification systems in the diagnosis of patients with low back pain: A systematic review.
Kajbafvala M; Rahmani N; Mohseni Bandpei MA; Salavati M
J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2020 Oct; 24(4):76-83. PubMed ID: 33218569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. The reliability of body pain diagrams in the quantitative measurement of pain distribution and location in patients with musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review.
Southerst D; Côté P; Stupar M; Stern P; Mior S
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2013 Sep; 36(7):450-9. PubMed ID: 23845196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Unilateral spondylolysis and the presence of facet joint tropism.
Rankine JJ; Dickson RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Oct; 35(21):E1111-4. PubMed ID: 20838273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Colloid Cyst Risk Score.
Alford EN; Rotman LE; Lepard JR; Agee BS; Markert JM
Neurosurgery; 2020 Jan; 86(1):E47-E53. PubMed ID: 31552408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Reliability of the visual assessment of cervical and lumbar lordosis: how good are we?
Fedorak C; Ashworth N; Marshall J; Paull H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1857-9. PubMed ID: 12923476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Quality assessment of systematic reviews for surgical treatment of low back pain: an overview.
Martins DE; Astur N; Kanas M; Ferretti M; Lenza M; Wajchenberg M
Spine J; 2016 May; 16(5):667-75. PubMed ID: 26826347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Reliability of specific physical examination tests for the diagnosis of shoulder pathologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lange T; Matthijs O; Jain NB; Schmitt J; Lützner J; Kopkow C
Br J Sports Med; 2017 Mar; 51(6):511-518. PubMed ID: 27993843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. The inter-rater reliability of clinical tests that best predict the subclassification of lumbar segmental instability: structural, functional and combined instability.
Alyazedi FM; Lohman EB; Wesley Swen R; Bahjri K
J Man Manip Ther; 2015 Sep; 23(4):197-204. PubMed ID: 26917937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Interrater reliability of the modified prone instability test for lumbar segmental instability in individuals with mechanical low back pain.
Larkin ER; Calley DQ; Hollman JH
J Man Manip Ther; 2024 May; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 38753496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. [Relevance of nerve blocks in treating and diagnosing low back pain--is the quality decisive?].
Hildebrandt J
Schmerz; 2001 Dec; 15(6):474-83. PubMed ID: 11793154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. The intra- and inter-observer reliability of the physical examination methods used to assess patients with patellofemoral joint instability.
Smith TO; Clark A; Neda S; Arendt EA; Post WR; Grelsamer RP; Dejour D; Almqvist KF; Donell ST
Knee; 2012 Aug; 19(4):404-10. PubMed ID: 21715175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
Cheng JS; Lee MJ; Massicotte E; Ashman B; Gruenberg M; Pilcher LE; Skelly AC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S144-63. PubMed ID: 21952186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
