These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27570476)

  • 21. Practical issues in the application of item response theory: a demonstration using items from the pediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 generic core scales.
    Hill CD; Edwards MC; Thissen D; Langer MM; Wirth RJ; Burwinkle TM; Varni JW
    Med Care; 2007 May; 45(5 Suppl 1):S39-47. PubMed ID: 17443118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Psychometric properties of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire-Revised among community-dwelling current drinkers in the Ningxia autonomous region of China.
    Cheng HG; Phillips MR; Zhang Y; Wang Z
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2016 Jul; 35(4):433-41. PubMed ID: 26194798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Methodological issues in measuring subjective well-being and quality-of-life: Applications to assessment of affect in older, chronically and cognitively impaired, ethnically diverse groups using the Feeling Tone Questionnaire.
    Teresi JA; Ocepek-Welikson K; Toner JA; Kleinman M; Ramirez M; Eimicke JP; Gurland BJ; Siu A
    Appl Res Qual Life; 2017 Jun; 12(2):251-288. PubMed ID: 30220935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Variance decomposition using an IRT measurement model.
    van den Berg SM; Glas CA; Boomsma DI
    Behav Genet; 2007 Jul; 37(4):604-16. PubMed ID: 17534709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An Approach to Scoring and Equating Tests With Binary Items: Piloting With Large-Scale Assessments.
    Dimitrov DM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Dec; 76(6):954-975. PubMed ID: 29795895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mixture Random-Effect IRT Models for Controlling Extreme Response Style on Rating Scales.
    Huang HY
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1706. PubMed ID: 27853444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The relationship between classical item characteristics and item response time on computer-based testing.
    Chae YM; Park SG; Park I
    Korean J Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 31(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 30852856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The feasibility of applying item response theory to measures of migraine impact: a re-analysis of three clinical studies.
    Bjorner JB; Kosinski M; Ware JE
    Qual Life Res; 2003 Dec; 12(8):887-902. PubMed ID: 14651410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Psychometric properties of the Children's Response Styles Questionnaire in a Hong Kong Chinese community sample.
    Lo BCY; Zhao Y; Ho YC; Au TK
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Oct; 15(1):198. PubMed ID: 29017501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A mixed-binomial model for Likert-type personality measures.
    Allik J
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():371. PubMed ID: 24847291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Investigation and analysis of child neglect in 1163 urban children aged 3 - 6 years].
    Yang ZN; Pan JP;
    Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Jul; 41(7):501-7. PubMed ID: 14746675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exploring the Multiverse of Analytical Decisions in Scaling Educational Large-Scale Assessment Data: A Specification Curve Analysis for PISA 2018 Mathematics Data.
    Robitzsch A
    Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ; 2022 Jul; 12(7):731-753. PubMed ID: 35877454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Extending the mixed-effects model to consider within-subject variance for Ecological Momentary Assessment data.
    Nordgren R; Hedeker D; Dunton G; Yang CH
    Stat Med; 2020 Feb; 39(5):577-590. PubMed ID: 31846119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rasch Analysis of the Disability Acceptance Scale for Individuals With Cerebral Palsy.
    Park EY
    Front Neurol; 2019; 10():1260. PubMed ID: 31920907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Impact of Test and Sample Characteristics on Model Selection and Classification Accuracy in the Multilevel Mixture IRT Model.
    Sen S; Cohen AS
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():197. PubMed ID: 32116973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Testing item response theory invariance of the standardized Quality-of-life Disease Impact Scale (QDIS(®)) in acute coronary syndrome patients: differential functioning of items and test.
    Deng N; Anatchkova MD; Waring ME; Han KT; Ware JE
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Aug; 24(8):1809-22. PubMed ID: 25601166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Item Response Theory Modeling for Examinee-selected Items with Rater Effect.
    Liu CW; Qiu XL; Wang WC
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Sep; 43(6):435-448. PubMed ID: 31452553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measuring drinking motives in undergraduates: an exploration of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire-Revised in Swedish students.
    Nehlin C; Öster C
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2019 Nov; 14(1):49. PubMed ID: 31703747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The e-MSWS-12: improving the multiple sclerosis walking scale using item response theory.
    Engelhard MM; Schmidt KM; Engel CE; Brenton JN; Patek SD; Goldman MD
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Dec; 25(12):3221-3230. PubMed ID: 27342237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Boundary curves of individual items in the distribution of total depressive symptom scores approximate an exponential pattern in a general population.
    Tomitaka S; Kawasaki Y; Ide K; Akutagawa M; Yamada H; Furukawa TA; Ono Y
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e2566. PubMed ID: 27761346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.