These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27571238)

  • 41. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. In vitro abrasion of resin-coated highly viscous glass ionomer cements: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.
    Kanik Ö; Turkun LS; Dasch W
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):821-829. PubMed ID: 27073101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars.
    Gaintantzopoulou MD; Gopinath VK; Zinelis S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 27165307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Six-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of two glass ionomer cements in class II cavities.
    Heck K; Frasheri I; Diegritz C; Manhart J; Hickel R; Fotiadou C
    J Dent; 2020 Jun; 97():103333. PubMed ID: 32305380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical Evaluation of Microhybrid Composite and Glass lonomer Restorative Material in Permanent Teeth.
    Kharma K; Zogheib T; Bhandi S; Mehanna C
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Feb; 19(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 29422475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
    Pollington S; van Noort R
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in Class V carious lesions.
    Abdalla AI; Alhadainy HA; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 9545915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Human pulp response to conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements applied in very deep cavities.
    Ribeiro APD; Sacono NT; Soares DG; Bordini EAF; de Souza Costa CA; Hebling J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 May; 24(5):1739-1748. PubMed ID: 31372829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical evaluation of four different dental restorative materials: one-year results.
    Daou MH; Tavernier B; Meyer JM
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2008; 118(4):290-5. PubMed ID: 18491670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
    Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Clinical performance and wear resistance of two compomers in posterior occlusal restorations of permanent teeth: six-year follow-up.
    Lund RG; Sehn FP; Piva E; Detoni D; Moura FR; Cardoso PE; Demarco FF
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 17427819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical evaluation of bulk-fill resins and glass ionomer restorative materials: A 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial in children.
    Akman H; Tosun G
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 23(4):489-497. PubMed ID: 32246655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of cavity lining on the restoration of root surface carious lesions: a split-mouth, 5-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Koc Vural U; Gokalp S; Kiremitci A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):979-989. PubMed ID: 31273529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
    Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical performance of fiber-reinforced nanofilled resin composite in extensively carious posterior teeth of children: 30-month evaluation.
    Candan U; Eronat N; Onçağ O
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 38(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24579274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A Two-year Clinical Comparison of Three Different Restorative Materials in Class II Cavities.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):E32-E42. PubMed ID: 31738696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
    Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.