561 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27571364)
21. Orthognathic surgery for correction of patients with mandibular excess: don't forget to assess the gonial angle.
Guglielmi M; Schneider KM; Iannetti G; Feng C; Martinez AY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 71(6):1063-72. PubMed ID: 23541992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A cross-sectional study on three-dimensional compensatory characteristics of maxillary teeth in patients with different types of skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry.
Li J; Liu Y; Ge X; Liu Z; Guan H; Wang L; Ma W
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):4973-4985. PubMed ID: 37417986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Perioral soft tissue change after isolated mandibular surgery for asymmetry patients.
Jeon EG; Lee ST; Kwon TG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 45(6):962-968. PubMed ID: 28363504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The stability of mandibular prognathism corrected by bilateral sagittal split osteotomies: a comparison of bi-cortical osteosynthesis and mono-cortical osteosynthesis.
Hsu SS; Huang CS; Chen PK; Ko EW; Chen YR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 22129998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Stress change on the temporomandibular joint in mandibular prognathism subjects with asymmetry after orthognathic surgery.
Ueki K; Nakagawa K; Marukawa K; Yamamoto E; Takeuchi N
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):522-9. PubMed ID: 20798211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Peripheral facial palsy after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: case report.
Shimada Y; Kawasaki Y; Maruoka Y
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 57(3):260-264. PubMed ID: 30910414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Change in condylar position in posterior bending osteotomy minimizing condylar torque in BSSRO for facial asymmetry.
Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 23816144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical effect of asymmetric mandibular prognathism treated with BSSRO and USSRO on temporomandibular joints: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Li H; Zhou N; Huang X; Zhang T; He S; Guo P
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Nov; 58(9):1103-1109. PubMed ID: 32646786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Change in mandibular body height at the site of a fixation plate in the advance (lengthening) and setback (shortening) sides after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Moroi A; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Ikawa H; Tsutsui T; Saida Y; Hotta A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 44(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 26787384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stability of lingual plate osteotomy in orthognathic surgery for patients with severe facial asymmetry: A retrospective analysis with 1-year follow-up.
Jeon HJ; Lee JS; Lee JW; Yang JD; Chung HY; Cho BC; Choi KY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2020 Feb; 48(2):156-161. PubMed ID: 31980277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Postsurgical Stability of Mandibular Setback With the Surgery-First Approach: Comparison Between Patients With Symmetry and Asymmetry.
Sun L; Lee KM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 77(7):1469.e1-1469.e11. PubMed ID: 31004589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Three-dimensional changes in condylar position in skeletal class Ⅲ patients with mandibular deviation after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy].
Huang JQ; Huang Z; Wu J; Wang YJ; Sang T; Liu F; Zheng Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):649-655. PubMed ID: 31606999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of postoperative stability after BSSRO to correct facial asymmetry depending on the amount of bone contact between the proximal and distal segment.
Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e165-70. PubMed ID: 24011465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The influence of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on submental-cervical aesthetics.
Soydan SS; Uckan S; Ustdal A; Bayram B; Bayrak B
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Nov; 41(11):816-21. PubMed ID: 24946129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Surgical Treatment of Class III Malocclusion: Monozygotic Twin.
Ertaş Ü; Saruhan N; Yalçin E
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 27(5):e471-3. PubMed ID: 27391516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-dimensional changes of proximal segments in facial asymmetry patients after bilateral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Huh JW; Kim SY; Lee YB; Park JH; Jung HD; Jung YS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Aug; 49(8):1036-1041. PubMed ID: 29776719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Changes in the lip-line in asymmetrical cases treated with isolated mandibular surgery.
Fujita T; Shirakura M; Koh M; Itoh G; Hayashi H; Tanne K
J Orthod; 2013 Dec; 40(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 24297963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques.
Yang HJ; Lee WJ; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 20382051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
