BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27573005)

  • 1. The many faces of a face: Comparing stills and videos of facial expressions in eight dimensions (SAVE database).
    Garrido MV; Lopes D; Prada M; Rodrigues D; Jerónimo R; Mourão RP
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1343-1360. PubMed ID: 27573005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceived emotion genuineness: normative ratings for popular facial expression stimuli and the development of perceived-as-genuine and perceived-as-fake sets.
    Dawel A; Wright L; Irons J; Dumbleton R; Palermo R; O'Kearney R; McKone E
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1539-1562. PubMed ID: 27928745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lisbon Emoji and Emoticon Database (LEED): Norms for emoji and emoticons in seven evaluative dimensions.
    Rodrigues D; Prada M; Gaspar R; Garrido MV; Lopes D
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Feb; 50(1):392-405. PubMed ID: 28364283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subjective ratings and emotional recognition of children's facial expressions from the CAFE set.
    Prada M; Garrido MV; Camilo C; Rodrigues DL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209644. PubMed ID: 30589868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. KDEF-PT: Valence, Emotional Intensity, Familiarity and Attractiveness Ratings of Angry, Neutral, and Happy Faces.
    Garrido MV; Prada M
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2181. PubMed ID: 29312053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are You Smiling, or Have I Seen You Before? Familiarity Makes Faces Look Happier.
    Carr EW; Brady TF; Winkielman P
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1087-1102. PubMed ID: 28594281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhanced emotional and motor responses to live versus videotaped dynamic facial expressions.
    Hsu CT; Sato W; Yoshikawa S
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16825. PubMed ID: 33033355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of positive and negative facial expressions on face familiarity.
    Lander K; Metcalfe S
    Memory; 2007 Jan; 15(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 17479925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Valence, arousal, and dominance ratings for facial stimuli.
    Sutton TM; Herbert AM; Clark DQ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Aug; 72(8):2046-2055. PubMed ID: 30760113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-cultural emotion recognition and evaluation of Radboud faces database with an Indian sample.
    Mishra MV; Ray SB; Srinivasan N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0203959. PubMed ID: 30273355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The City Infant Faces Database: A validated set of infant facial expressions.
    Webb R; Ayers S; Endress A
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Feb; 50(1):151-159. PubMed ID: 28205132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Familiarity breeds attraction: effects of exposure on the attractiveness of typical and distinctive faces.
    Peskin M; Newell FN
    Perception; 2004; 33(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 15109158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. You may look unhappy unless you smile: the distinctiveness of a smiling face against faces without an explicit smile.
    Park HB; Han JE; Hyun JS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 May; 157():185-94. PubMed ID: 25819385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of temporal dynamics on perceived authenticity of smiles.
    Horic-Asselin D; Brosseau-Liard P; Gosselin P; Collin CA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3648-3657. PubMed ID: 32596774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reading a smiling face: messages conveyed by various forms of smiling.
    Otta E; Folladore Abrosio F; Hoshino RL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 2):1111-21. PubMed ID: 8823879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Sabancı University Dynamic Face Database (SUDFace): Development and validation of an audiovisual stimulus set of recited and free speeches with neutral facial expressions.
    Şentürk YD; Tavacioglu EE; Duymaz İ; Sayim B; Alp N
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):3078-3099. PubMed ID: 36018484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual attention during the evaluation of facial attractiveness is influenced by facial angles and smile.
    Kim SH; Hwang S; Hong YJ; Kim JJ; Kim KH; Chung CJ
    Angle Orthod; 2018 May; 88(3):329-337. PubMed ID: 29376732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Smile dimensions affect self-perceived smile attractiveness.
    Horn S; Matuszewska N; Gkantidis N; Verna C; Kanavakis G
    Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):2779. PubMed ID: 33531621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The DalHouses: 100 new photographs of houses with ratings of typicality, familiarity, and degree of similarity to faces.
    Filliter JH; Glover JM; McMullen PA; Salmon JP; Johnson SA
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):178-83. PubMed ID: 25675877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lisbon Symbol Database (LSD): Subjective norms for 600 symbols.
    Prada M; Rodrigues D; Silva RR; Garrido MV
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1370-1382. PubMed ID: 26276520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.