375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27573318)
1. Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: A systematic review.
Yusif S; Soar J; Hafeez-Baig A
Int J Med Inform; 2016 Oct; 94():112-6. PubMed ID: 27573318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bridging the digital divide in older adults: a study from an initiative to inform older adults about new technologies.
Wu YH; Damnée S; Kerhervé H; Ware C; Rigaud AS
Clin Interv Aging; 2015; 10():193-200. PubMed ID: 25624752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of assistive technology and home modifications on falls in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review protocol.
Crosby KM; Rodriguez CA; Canas MA; Kim C; Noroozi S; Vis-Dunbar M; Komisar V; Sakakibara BM; Jakobi JM
Syst Rev; 2023 Nov; 12(1):204. PubMed ID: 37936167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assistive technologies in reducing caregiver burden among informal caregivers of older adults: a systematic review.
Madara Marasinghe K
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 26371519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical Considerations Regarding the Use of Smart Home Technologies for Older Adults: An Integrative Review.
Chung J; Demiris G; Thompson HJ
Annu Rev Nurs Res; 2016; 34():155-81. PubMed ID: 26673381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acceptance and Use of Innovative Assistive Technologies among People with Cognitive Impairment and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review.
Thordardottir B; Malmgren Fänge A; Lethin C; Rodriguez Gatta D; Chiatti C
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():9196729. PubMed ID: 30956989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In-Home Monitoring Technology for Aging in Place: Scoping Review.
Kim D; Bian H; Chang CK; Dong L; Margrett J
Interact J Med Res; 2022 Sep; 11(2):e39005. PubMed ID: 36048502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Importance of Trust in the Adoption and Use of Intelligent Assistive Technology by Older Adults to Support Aging in Place: Scoping Review Protocol.
McMurray J; Strudwick G; Forchuk C; Morse A; Lachance J; Baskaran A; Allison L; Booth R
JMIR Res Protoc; 2017 Nov; 6(11):e218. PubMed ID: 29097354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Innovative Assisted Living Tools, Remote Monitoring Technologies, Artificial Intelligence-Driven Solutions, and Robotic Systems for Aging Societies: Systematic Review.
Sapci AH; Sapci HA
JMIR Aging; 2019 Nov; 2(2):e15429. PubMed ID: 31782740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical issues arising from a research, technology and development project to support frail older people and their family carers at home.
Magnusson L; Hanson EJ
Health Soc Care Community; 2003 Sep; 11(5):431-9. PubMed ID: 14498840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meanings and experiences of assistive technologies in everyday lives of older citizens: a meta-interpretive review.
Dahler AM; Rasmussen DM; Andersen PT
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016 Nov; 11(8):619-29. PubMed ID: 27052680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethics and acceptance of smart homes for older adults.
Pirzada P; Wilde A; Doherty GH; Harris-Birtill D
Inform Health Soc Care; 2022 Jan; 47(1):10-37. PubMed ID: 34240661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Smart homes and home health monitoring technologies for older adults: A systematic review.
Liu L; Stroulia E; Nikolaidis I; Miguel-Cruz A; Rios Rincon A
Int J Med Inform; 2016 Jul; 91():44-59. PubMed ID: 27185508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Older adults' perceptions of technologies aimed at falls prevention, detection or monitoring: a systematic review.
Hawley-Hague H; Boulton E; Hall A; Pfeiffer K; Todd C
Int J Med Inform; 2014 Jun; 83(6):416-26. PubMed ID: 24798946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Privacy Barriers in Health Monitoring: Scoping Review.
Sun L; Yang B; Kindt E; Chu J
JMIR Nurs; 2024 May; 7():e53592. PubMed ID: 38723253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Privacy and senior willingness to adopt smart home information technology in residential care facilities.
Courtney KL
Methods Inf Med; 2008; 47(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 18213432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Personal and Interpersonal Drivers that Contribute to the Intention to Use Gerontechnologies.
De Regge M; Van Baelen F; Beirão G; Den Ambtman A; De Pourcq K; Dias JC; Kandampully J
Gerontology; 2020; 66(2):176-186. PubMed ID: 31480067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shaping technologies for older adults with and without dementia: Reflections on ethics and preferences.
Diaz-Orueta U; Hopper L; Konstantinidis E
Health Informatics J; 2020 Dec; 26(4):3215-3230. PubMed ID: 31969045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A systematic review of factors influencing attitudes towards and intention to use the long-distance caregiving technologies for older adults.
Wang J; Fu Y; Lou V; Tan SY; Chui E
Int J Med Inform; 2021 Sep; 153():104536. PubMed ID: 34325206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Location tracking: views from the older adult population.
Thomas L; Little L; Briggs P; McInnes L; Jones E; Nicholson J
Age Ageing; 2013 Nov; 42(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 23761455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
