These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27573325)

  • 1. The evaluation of i-SIDRA - a tool for intelligent feedback - in a course on the anatomy of the locomotor system.
    Fernández-Alemán JL; López-González L; González-Sequeros O; Jayne C; López-Jiménez JJ; Toval A
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Oct; 94():172-81. PubMed ID: 27573325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Empirical Study of Neural Network-Based Audience Response Technology in a Human Anatomy Course for Pharmacy Students.
    Fernández-Alemán JL; López-González L; González-Sequeros O; Jayne C; López-Jiménez JJ; Carrillo-de-Gea JM; Toval A
    J Med Syst; 2016 Apr; 40(4):85. PubMed ID: 26815339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Taking the pulse of a classroom with a gamified audience response system.
    López-Jiménez JJ; Fernández-Alemán JL; González LL; Sequeros OG; Valle BM; García-Berná JA; Idri A; Toval A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jan; 213():106459. PubMed ID: 34768233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Gamification on the Benefits of Student Response Systems in Learning of Human Anatomy: Three Experimental Studies.
    López-Jiménez JJ; Fernández-Alemán JL; García-Berná JA; López González L; González Sequeros O; Nicolás Ros J; Carrillo de Gea JM; Idri A; Toval A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Dec; 18(24):. PubMed ID: 34948818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Certainty rating in pre-and post-tests of study modules in an online clinical pharmacy course - A pilot study to evaluate teaching and learning.
    Luetsch K; Burrows J
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):267. PubMed ID: 27741945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course.
    Azzi AJ; Ramnanan CJ; Smith J; Dionne É; Jalali A
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 25227111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork.
    Huitt TW; Killins A; Brooks WS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24799448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory.
    Traser CJ; Hoffman LA; Seifert MF; Wilson AB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25288343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Computer-Assisted Learning on Students' Dental Anatomy Waxing Performance.
    Kwon SR; Hernández M; Blanchette DR; Lam MT; Gratton DG; Aquilino SA
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1093-100. PubMed ID: 26329034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Post-exam feedback with question rationales improves re-test performance of medical students on a multiple-choice exam.
    Levant B; Zückert W; Paolo A
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Dec; 23(5):995-1003. PubMed ID: 30043313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tensions in post-examination feedback: information for learning versus potential for harm.
    Ryan A; McColl GJ; O'Brien R; Chiavaroli N; Judd T; Finch S; Swanson D
    Med Educ; 2017 Sep; 51(9):963-973. PubMed ID: 28833428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment drives learning: an unavoidable truth?
    Wormald BW; Schoeman S; Somasunderam A; Penn M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2009 Oct; 2(5):199-204. PubMed ID: 19743508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital lectures for learning gross anatomy: a study of their efficacy.
    Singh A; Min AK
    Korean J Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 29(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28264551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes.
    Nwachukwu C; Lachman N; Pawlina W
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 24799441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating physical examination and trunk anatomy; a new course for second year medical students.
    Adibi I; Hasani N; Ashoorioun V; Sadrearhami S; Monajemi AR
    Med Teach; 2007 Nov; 29(9):975-7. PubMed ID: 18158675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students.
    Azer SA; Eizenberg N
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2007 Mar; 29(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 17318286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining the impact of audience response systems on student performance in anatomy education: a randomised controlled trial.
    Fergusson SJ; Aka JJ; Hennessy CM; Wilson AJ; Parson SH; Harrison EM; Finn GM; Gillingwater TH
    Scott Med J; 2018 Feb; 63(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 29911503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating students' reflection-in-learning and examination performance as a method for providing educational feedback.
    Devi V; Mandal T; Kodidela S; Pallath V
    J Postgrad Med; 2012; 58(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 23298922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does providing the correct diagnosis as feedback after self-explanation improve medical students diagnostic performance?
    Chamberland M; Setrakian J; St-Onge C; Bergeron L; Mamede S; Schmidt HG
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 19(1):194. PubMed ID: 31185971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dental anatomy carving computer-assisted instruction program: an assessment of student performance and perceptions.
    Nance ET; Lanning SK; Gunsolley JC
    J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 73(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 19648568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.