170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27573571)
1. Device and Medication Preferences of Canadian Physicians for Emergent Endotracheal Intubation in Critically Ill Patients.
Green RS; Fergusson DA; Turgeon AF; McIntyre LA; Kovacs GJ; Griesdale DE; Zarychanski R; Butler MB; Kureshi N; Erdogan M
CJEM; 2017 May; 19(3):186-197. PubMed ID: 27573571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resuscitation Prior to Emergency Endotracheal Intubation: Results of a National Survey.
Green RS; Fergusson DA; Turgeon AF; McIntyre LA; Kovacs GJ; Griesdale DE; Zarychanski R; Butler MB; Kureshi N; Erdogan M
West J Emerg Med; 2016 Sep; 17(5):542-8. PubMed ID: 27625717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survey on the Current State of Endotracheal Intubation Among the Critically Ill: HEMAIR Investigators.
Seisa MO; Gondhi V; Demirci O; Diedrich DA; Kashyap R; Smischney NJ
J Intensive Care Med; 2018 Jun; 33(6):354-360. PubMed ID: 27298389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of video laryngoscopy use during urgent endotracheal intubation in the critically ill.
Kory P; Guevarra K; Mathew JP; Hegde A; Mayo PH
Anesth Analg; 2013 Jul; 117(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 23687228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anesthesiologist and Emergency Medicine Physician Attitudes and Knowledge Regarding Etomidate for Intubation.
Clinkard D; Priestap F; Ridi S; Bruder E; Ball IM
J Intensive Care Med; 2020 Oct; 35(10):1008-1012. PubMed ID: 30336713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Macintosh and Intubrite laryngoscopes for intubation performed by novice physicians in a difficult airway scenario.
Szarpak L; Smereka J; Ladny JR
Am J Emerg Med; 2017 May; 35(5):796-797. PubMed ID: 28139309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transfer of skills and comparison of performance between king vision® video laryngoscope and macintosh blade following an AHA airway management course.
Wolf LE; Aguirre JA; Vogt C; Keller C; Borgeat A; Bruppacher HR
BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):5. PubMed ID: 28125969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer].
Ruetzler K; Imach S; Weiss M; Haas T; Schmidt AR
Anaesthesist; 2015 Jul; 64(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 26174747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim.
Wetsch WA; Carlitscheck M; Spelten O; Teschendorf P; Hellmich M; Genzwürker HV; Hinkelbein J
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 28(12):849-58. PubMed ID: 21986981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized Trial of Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults.
Janz DR; Semler MW; Lentz RJ; Matthews DT; Assad TR; Norman BC; Keriwala RD; Ferrell BA; Noto MJ; Shaver CM; Richmond BW; Zinggeler Berg J; Rice TW;
Crit Care Med; 2016 Nov; 44(11):1980-1987. PubMed ID: 27355526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Learning curves for direct laryngoscopy and GlideScope® video laryngoscopy in an emergency medicine residency.
Sakles JC; Mosier J; Patanwala AE; Dicken J
West J Emerg Med; 2014 Nov; 15(7):930-7. PubMed ID: 25493156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Rigid Fiberscope with Direct Laryngoscopy in Easy and Difficult Airway Scenarios: A Manikin Study.
Kaplan A; Göksu E; Yıldız G; Kılıç T
J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 50(3):e107-14. PubMed ID: 26725922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope, and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins.
McElwain J; Malik MA; Harte BH; Flynn NM; Laffey JG
Anaesthesia; 2010 May; 65(5):483-9. PubMed ID: 20337620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the Truview PCD and the GlideScope Cobalt AVL video-laryngoscopes to the Miller blade for successfully intubating manikins simulating normal and difficult pediatric airways.
Hippard HK; Kalyani G; Olutoye OA; Mann DG; Watcha MF
Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 Jun; 26(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 27083381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in critically ill patients: a pilot randomized trial.
Griesdale DE; Chau A; Isac G; Ayas N; Foster D; Irwin C; Choi P;
Can J Anaesth; 2012 Nov; 59(11):1032-9. PubMed ID: 22932944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inverse intubation in entrapped trauma casualties: a simulator based, randomised cross-over comparison of direct, indirect and video laryngoscopy.
Schober P; Krage R; van Groeningen D; Loer SA; Schwarte LA
Emerg Med J; 2014 Dec; 31(12):959-63. PubMed ID: 24005641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel.
Nouruzi-Sedeh P; Schumann M; Groeben H
Anesthesiology; 2009 Jan; 110(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 19104167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Survey of video laryngoscopy use by U.S. critical care fellowship training programs.
Silverberg MJ; Kory P
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2014 Oct; 11(8):1225-9. PubMed ID: 25167930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy during urgent endotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial.
Silverberg MJ; Li N; Acquah SO; Kory PD
Crit Care Med; 2015 Mar; 43(3):636-41. PubMed ID: 25479112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M
Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
