These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27573713)
1. Validation of a multi-criteria evaluation model for animal welfare. Martín P; Czycholl I; Buxadé C; Krieter J Animal; 2017 Apr; 11(4):650-660. PubMed ID: 27573713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of a multi-criteria evaluation system to assess growing pig welfare. Martín P; Traulsen I; Buxadé C; Krieter J Animal; 2017 Mar; 11(3):466-477. PubMed ID: 27431514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the multi-criteria evaluation system of the Welfare Quality® protocol for growing pigs. Czycholl I; Kniese C; Schrader L; Krieter J Animal; 2017 Sep; 11(9):1573-1580. PubMed ID: 28219478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On-farm animal welfare assessment in beef bulls: consistency over time of single measures and aggregated Welfare Quality(®) scores. Kirchner MK; Schulze Westerath H; Knierim U; Tessitore E; Cozzi G; Winckler C Animal; 2014 Mar; 8(3):461-9. PubMed ID: 24330803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating results of the Welfare Quality multi-criteria evaluation model for classification of dairy cattle welfare at the herd level. de Vries M; Bokkers EA; van Schaik G; Botreau R; Engel B; Dijkstra T; de Boer IJ J Dairy Sci; 2013 Oct; 96(10):6264-73. PubMed ID: 23932136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trained-user opinion about Welfare Quality measures and integrated scoring of dairy cattle welfare. de Graaf S; Ampe B; Winckler C; Radeski M; Mounier L; Kirchner MK; Haskell MJ; van Eerdenburg FJCM; des Roches AB; Andreasen SN; Bijttebier J; Lauwers L; Verbeke W; Tuyttens FAM J Dairy Sci; 2017 Aug; 100(8):6376-6388. PubMed ID: 28571983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of the Welfare Quality® assessment system on European beef bull farms. Kirchner MK; Schulze Westerath H; Knierim U; Tessitore E; Cozzi G; Pfeiffer C; Winckler C Animal; 2014 May; 8(5):827-35. PubMed ID: 24739354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Test-retest reliability of the Welfare Quality Assessment protocol for pigs applied to sows and piglets. Part 2. Assessment of the principles good feeding, good housing, and good health1. Friedrich L; Krieter J; Kemper N; Czycholl I J Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 97(3):1143-1157. PubMed ID: 30668710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of animal-based parameters with environment-based parameters in an on-farm welfare assessment of growing pigs. Kang HJ; Bae S; Lee H J Anim Sci Technol; 2022 May; 64(3):539-563. PubMed ID: 35709106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simplifying the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for broiler chicken welfare. de Jong IC; Hindle VA; Butterworth A; Engel B; Ferrari P; Gunnink H; Perez Moya T; Tuyttens FA; van Reenen CG Animal; 2016 Jan; 10(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 26306882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can the monitoring of animal welfare parameters predict pork meat quality variation through the supply chain (from farm to slaughter)? Rocha LM; Velarde A; Dalmau A; Saucier L; Faucitano L J Anim Sci; 2016 Jan; 94(1):359-76. PubMed ID: 26812341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of Daily Grazing Time on Dairy Cow Welfare-Results of the Welfare Quality Wagner K; Brinkmann J; March S; Hinterstoißer P; Warnecke S; Schüler M; Paulsen HM Animals (Basel); 2017 Dec; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 29271918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of animal welfare indicators for the on-farm self-assessment of fattening pigs. Pfeifer M; Eggemann L; Kransmann J; Schmitt AO; Hessel EF Animal; 2019 Aug; 13(8):1712-1720. PubMed ID: 30630538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ANIMAL BEHAVIOR AND WELL-BEING SYMPOSIUM: The Common Swine Industry Audit: Future steps to assure positive on-farm animal welfare utilizing validated, repeatable and feasible animal-based measures. Pairis-Garcia M; Moeller SJ J Anim Sci; 2017 Mar; 95(3):1372-1381. PubMed ID: 28380534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Protocol to Assess the Welfare of Patagonian Huemul ( Bombal E; Manteca X; Tallo-Parra O Animals (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(15):. PubMed ID: 37570303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A New, Practical Animal Welfare Assessment for Dairy Farmers. van Eerdenburg FJCM; Di Giacinto AM; Hulsen J; Snel B; Stegeman JA Animals (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33808871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 2: analysis of constraints. Botreau R; Bracke MB; Perny P; Butterworth A; Capdeville J; Van Reenen CG; Veissier I Animal; 2007 Sep; 1(8):1188-97. PubMed ID: 22444863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alternative farrowing accommodation: welfare and economic aspects of existing farrowing and lactation systems for pigs. Baxter EM; Lawrence AB; Edwards SA Animal; 2012 Jan; 6(1):96-117. PubMed ID: 22436159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short communication: Evaluation of the sample size of individual indicators in gestating sows concerning the Welfare Quality® protocol applied to sows and piglets. Friedrich L; Krieter J; Kemper N; Czycholl I Animal; 2020 Jun; 14(6):1278-1282. PubMed ID: 31937377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Navigating the iceberg: reducing the number of parameters within the Welfare Quality(®) assessment protocol for dairy cows. Heath CA; Browne WJ; Mullan S; Main DC Animal; 2014 Dec; 8(12):1978-86. PubMed ID: 25159607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]