These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27573713)

  • 21. Reliability of the qualitative behavior assessment as included in the Welfare Quality Assessment protocol for growing pigs.
    Czycholl I; Beilage EG; Henning C; Krieter J
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3445-3454. PubMed ID: 28805930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Data-driven evolution of water quality models: An in-depth investigation of innovative outlier detection approaches-A case study of Irish Water Quality Index (IEWQI) model.
    Uddin MG; Rahman A; Rosa Taghikhah F; Olbert AI
    Water Res; 2024 May; 255():121499. PubMed ID: 38552494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Should the Contribution of One Additional Lame Cow Depend on How Many Other Cows on the Farm Are Lame?
    Sandøe P; Forkman B; Hakansson F; Andreasen SN; Nøhr R; Denwood M; Lund TB
    Animals (Basel); 2017 Dec; 7(12):. PubMed ID: 29232887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sensitivity of the Welfare Quality® broiler chicken protocol to differences between intensively reared indoor flocks: which factors explain overall classification?
    Buijs S; Ampe B; Tuyttens FA
    Animal; 2017 Feb; 11(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 27416919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation of carcass lesions as indicators for on-farm health and welfare of pigs.
    van Staaveren N; Doyle B; Manzanilla EG; Calderón Díaz JA; Hanlon A; Boyle LA
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1528-1536. PubMed ID: 28464078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Creating a model to detect dairy cattle farms with poor welfare using a national database.
    Krug C; Haskell MJ; Nunes T; Stilwell G
    Prev Vet Med; 2015 Dec; 122(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26549665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of Chinese Broiler Production Systems in Economic Performance and Animal Welfare.
    Chen Q; W Saatkamp H; Cortenbach J; Jin W
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 32183491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of welfare of Brazilian and Belgian broiler flocks using the Welfare Quality protocol.
    Tuyttens FA; Federici JF; Vanderhasselt RF; Goethals K; Duchateau L; Sans EC; Molento CF
    Poult Sci; 2015 Aug; 94(8):1758-66. PubMed ID: 26049803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does group size have an impact on welfare indicators in fattening pigs?
    Meyer-Hamme SE; Lambertz C; Gauly M
    Animal; 2016 Jan; 10(1):142-9. PubMed ID: 26304017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Review: The challenge to integrate animal welfare indicators into the Life Cycle Assessment.
    Lanzoni L; Whatford L; Atzori AS; Chincarini M; Giammarco M; Fusaro I; Vignola G
    Animal; 2023 May; 17(5):100794. PubMed ID: 37121159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multicriteria Evaluation of Classical Swine Fever Control Strategies Using the Choquet Integral.
    Brosig J; Traulsen I; Krieter J
    Transbound Emerg Dis; 2016 Feb; 63(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 24661927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Identifying and measuring stakeholder preferences for disease prioritisation: A case study of the pig industry in Australia.
    Brookes VJ; Hernández-Jover M; Neslo R; Cowled B; Holyoake P; Ward MP
    Prev Vet Med; 2014 Jan; 113(1):118-31. PubMed ID: 24211106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development of pig welfare assessment protocol integrating animal-, environment-, and management-based measures.
    Renggaman A; Choi HL; Sudiarto SIa; Alasaarela L; Nam OS
    J Anim Sci Technol; 2015; 57():1. PubMed ID: 26290721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Decision support system for overall welfare assessment in pregnant sows A: model structure and weighting procedure.
    Bracke MB; Spruijt BM; Metz JH; Schouten WG
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Jul; 80(7):1819-34. PubMed ID: 12162649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Animal welfare assessment at slaughter in Europe: moving from inputs to outputs.
    Velarde A; Dalmau A
    Meat Sci; 2012 Nov; 92(3):244-51. PubMed ID: 22551869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Options for managing animal welfare on intensive pig farms confined by movement restrictions during an outbreak of foot and mouth disease.
    East IJ; Roche SE; Wicks RM; de Witte K; Garner MG
    Prev Vet Med; 2014 Dec; 117(3-4):533-41. PubMed ID: 25457134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems: assessment of feeding and housing.
    Temple D; Courboulay V; Manteca X; Velarde A; Dalmau A
    Animal; 2012 Apr; 6(4):656-67. PubMed ID: 22436283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimating the scale of adverse animal welfare consequences of movement restriction and mitigation strategies in a classical swine fever outbreak.
    Yadav S; Weng HY
    BMC Vet Res; 2017 Apr; 13(1):83. PubMed ID: 28376865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reliability of sampling strategies for measuring dairy cattle welfare on commercial farms.
    Van Os JMC; Winckler C; Trieb J; Matarazzo SV; Lehenbauer TW; Champagne JD; Tucker CB
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Feb; 101(2):1495-1504. PubMed ID: 29248223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing animal welfare in sow herds using data on meat inspection, medication and mortality.
    Knage-Rasmussen KM; Rousing T; Sørensen JT; Houe H
    Animal; 2015 Mar; 9(3):509-15. PubMed ID: 25385251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.