These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27573932)
1. Process contribution evaluation for COD removal and energy production from molasses wastewater in a BioH Yun J; Lee YY; Choi HJ; Cho KS Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2017 Jan; 40(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 27573932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performances of microbial fuel cells fed with rejected wastewater from BioCH4 and BioH2 processes treating molasses wastewater. Lee YY; Kim TG; Cho KS J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2016; 51(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 26756976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review. Bal AS; Dhagat NN Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel UASB-MFC-BAF integrated system for high strength molasses wastewater treatment and bioelectricity generation. Zhang B; Zhao H; Zhou S; Shi C; Wang C; Ni J Bioresour Technol; 2009 Dec; 100(23):5687-93. PubMed ID: 19604688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of pentachlorophenol and chemical oxygen demand mass concentrations in influent on operational behaviors of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Shen DS; He R; Liu XW; Long Y J Hazard Mater; 2006 Aug; 136(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 16513261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integration of a microbial fuel cell with activated sludge process for energy-saving wastewater treatment: taking a sequencing batch reactor as an example. Liu XW; Wang YP; Huang YX; Sun XF; Sheng GP; Zeng RJ; Li F; Dong F; Wang SG; Tong ZH; Yu HQ Biotechnol Bioeng; 2011 Jun; 108(6):1260-7. PubMed ID: 21290383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Coproduction of hydrogen and methane in a CSTR-IC two-stage anaerobic digestion system from molasses wastewater. Li Q; Li Y Water Sci Technol; 2019 Jan; 79(2):270-277. PubMed ID: 30865598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fermentative hydrogen production from molasses wastewater in a continuous mixed immobilized sludge reactor. Han W; Wang B; Zhou Y; Wang DX; Wang Y; Yue LR; Li YF; Ren NQ Bioresour Technol; 2012 Apr; 110():219-23. PubMed ID: 22326329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-stage biogas production by co-digesting molasses wastewater and sewage sludge. Lee JY; Yun J; Kim TG; Wee D; Cho KS Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2014 Dec; 37(12):2401-13. PubMed ID: 24871275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of increasing nitrobenzene loading rates on the performance of anaerobic migrating blanket reactor and sequential anaerobic migrating blanket reactor/completely stirred tank reactor system. Kuşçu OS; Sponza DT J Hazard Mater; 2009 Aug; 168(1):390-9. PubMed ID: 19286317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-rate treatment of molasses wastewater by combination of an acidification reactor and a USSB reactor. Onodera T; Sase S; Choeisai P; Yoochatchaval W; Sumino H; Yamaguchi T; Ebie Y; Xu K; Tomioka N; Syutsubo K J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2011; 46(14):1721-31. PubMed ID: 22175876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydrogen and electricity production from a food processing wastewater using fermentation and microbial fuel cell technologies. Oh SE; Logan BE Water Res; 2005 Nov; 39(19):4673-82. PubMed ID: 16289673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of shock 2,4-dichlorophenol (DCP) and cod loading rates on the removal of 2,4-DCP in a sequential upflow anaerobic sludge blanket/aerobic completely stirred tank reactor system. Uluköy A; Sponza DT Environ Technol; 2008 Apr; 29(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 18619146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Removal of residual dissolved methane gas in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating low-strength wastewater at low temperature with degassing membrane. Bandara WM; Satoh H; Sasakawa M; Nakahara Y; Takahashi M; Okabe S Water Res; 2011 May; 45(11):3533-40. PubMed ID: 21550096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of hydraulic retention time on suppression of methanogens during a continuous biohydrogen production process using molasses wastewater. Yun JH; Cho KS J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2017 Jan; 52(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 27610651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. From microbial fuel cell (MFC) to microbial electrochemical snorkel (MES): maximizing chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal from wastewater. Erable B; Etcheverry L; Bergel A Biofouling; 2011 Mar; 27(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 21409654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of hydraulic retention time (HRT) and sludge retention time (SRT) on the treatment of nitrobenzene in AMBR/CSTR reactor systems. Kuscu OS; Sponza DT Environ Technol; 2007 Mar; 28(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 17432381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation and optimization of the novel UASB-MFC integrated system for sulfate removal and bioelectricity generation using the response surface methodology (RSM). Zhang B; Zhang J; Yang Q; Feng C; Zhu Y; Ye Z; Ni J Bioresour Technol; 2012 Nov; 124():1-7. PubMed ID: 22985846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement of COD and color removal from UASB treated poultry manure wastewater using Fenton's oxidation. Yetilmezsoy K; Sakar S J Hazard Mater; 2008 Mar; 151(2-3):547-58. PubMed ID: 17643817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment of domestic wastewater in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor followed by moving bed biofilm reactor. Tawfik A; El-Gohary F; Temmink H Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2010 Feb; 33(2):267-76. PubMed ID: 19404682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]