These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27573932)
21. Effects of ORP, recycling rate, and HRT on simultaneous sulfate reduction and sulfur production in expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactors under micro-aerobic conditions for treating molasses distillery wastewater. Qinglin X; Yanhong L; Shaoyuan B; Hongda J Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(6):1253-62. PubMed ID: 22828303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluating the efficiency of a mixed culture biofilm for the treatment of black liquor and molasses in a mediator-less microbial fuel cell. Ali N; Yousaf S; Anam M; Bangash Z; Maleeha S Environ Technol; 2016 Nov; 37(22):2815-22. PubMed ID: 26984479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biohydrogen production in an AFBR using sugarcane molasses. Chaves TC; Gois GNSB; Peiter FS; Vich DV; de Amorim ELC Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2021 Feb; 44(2):307-316. PubMed ID: 32978660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Long-term performance of liter-scale microbial fuel cells treating primary effluent installed in a municipal wastewater treatment facility. Zhang F; Ge Z; Grimaud J; Hurst J; He Z Environ Sci Technol; 2013 May; 47(9):4941-8. PubMed ID: 23517192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biohydrogen production by mesophilic fermentation of food wastewater. Wu JH; Lin CY Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):223-8. PubMed ID: 15137427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Electricity generation from young landfill leachate in a microbial fuel cell with a new electrode material. Özkaya B; Cetinkaya AY; Cakmakci M; Karadağ D; Sahinkaya E Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2013 Apr; 36(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 22903571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the methanogenic step of a two-stage anaerobic digestion process of acidified olive mill solid residue from a previous hydrolytic-acidogenic step. Rincón B; Borja R; Martín MA; Martín A Waste Manag; 2009 Sep; 29(9):2566-73. PubMed ID: 19450962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Performance of an up-flow anaerobic stage reactor (UASR) in the treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater containing macrolide antibiotics. Chelliapan S; Wilby T; Sallis PJ Water Res; 2006 Feb; 40(3):507-16. PubMed ID: 16387347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mathematical modeling of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating domestic wastewater. Elmitwalli T Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 23128617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Electricity generation from sweet potato fuel ethanol wastewater using microbial fuel cell technology]. Cai XB; Yang Y; Sun YP; Zhang L; Xiao Y; Zhao H Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2010 Oct; 31(10):2512-7. PubMed ID: 21229770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bioaugmentation with Mixed Hydrogen-Producing Acetogen Cultures Enhances Methane Production in Molasses Wastewater Treatment. Wang S; Li J; Zheng G; Du G; Li J Archaea; 2018; 2018():4634898. PubMed ID: 30154680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of organic loading rate on hydrogen and volatile fatty acid production and microbial community during acidogenic hydrogenesis in a continuous stirred tank reactor using molasses wastewater. Yun J; Cho KS J Appl Microbiol; 2016 Dec; 121(6):1627-1636. PubMed ID: 27709740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A cooperative microbial fuel cell system for waste treatment and energy recovery. Zhang F; He Z Environ Technol; 2013; 34(13-16):1905-13. PubMed ID: 24350444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A fuzzy-logic-based model to predict biogas and methane production rates in a pilot-scale mesophilic UASB reactor treating molasses wastewater. Turkdogan-Aydinol FI; Yetilmezsoy K J Hazard Mater; 2010 Oct; 182(1-3):460-71. PubMed ID: 20609515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. High rate treatment of terephthalic acid production wastewater in a two-stage anaerobic bioreactor. Kleerebezem R; Beckers J; Hulshoff Pol LW; Lettinga G Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Jul; 91(2):169-79. PubMed ID: 15889396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Rice mill wastewater treatment in microbial fuel cells fabricated using proton exchange membrane and earthen pot at different pH. Behera M; Jana PS; More TT; Ghangrekar MM Bioelectrochemistry; 2010 Oct; 79(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 20615762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of organic loading rates and proton exchange membrane surface area on the performance of an up-flow cylindrical microbial fuel cell. Jana PS; Behera M; Ghangrekar MM J Environ Sci Eng; 2012 Jan; 54(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23741851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Continuous ozonation of biologically pretreated molasses fermentation effluents. Peña M; Coca M; González G J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2007 May; 42(6):777-83. PubMed ID: 17474004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Investigation of Anaerobic Fluidized Bed Reactor/ Aerobic Moving Bed Bio Reactor (AFBR/MMBR) System for Treatment of Currant Wastewater. Jafari J; Mesdaghinia A; Nabizadeh R; Farrokhi M; Mahvi AH Iran J Public Health; 2013 Aug; 42(8):860-7. PubMed ID: 26056640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]