These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2757456)

  • 1. Effect of sperm motility on human in vitro fertilization.
    Bongso TA; Ng SC; Mok H; Lim MN; Teo HL; Wong PC; Ratnam SS
    Arch Androl; 1989; 22(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 2757456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between sperm motility assessed with the Hamilton-Thorn motility analyzer and fertilization rates in vitro.
    Liu DY; Clarke GN; Baker HW
    J Androl; 1991; 12(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 1917688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved sperm concentration, motility, and fertilization rates following Ficoll treatment of sperm in a human in vitro fertilization program.
    Bongso A; Ng SC; Mok H; Lim MN; Teo HL; Wong PC; Ratnam S
    Fertil Steril; 1989 May; 51(5):850-4. PubMed ID: 2707461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Poor in vitro fertilization outcome with semen yielding low sperm density "swim-ups" is not because of altered sperm motion parameters.
    Thanki KH; Gagliardi CL; Schmidt CL
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Oct; 58(4):770-5. PubMed ID: 1426324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sperm motion parameters in vas deferens and cauda epididymal rat sperm.
    Dostal LA; Faber CK; Zandee J
    Reprod Toxicol; 1996; 10(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 8738561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationships between sperm motility characteristics assessed by the computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) and fertilization rates in vitro.
    Hirano Y; Shibahara H; Obara H; Suzuki T; Takamizawa S; Yamaguchi C; Tsunoda H; Sato I
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2001 Apr; 18(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 11432113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between human sperm motility characteristics and sperm penetration into human cervical mucus in vitro.
    Mortimer D; Pandya IJ; Sawers RS
    J Reprod Fertil; 1986 Sep; 78(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 3761279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Computer-assisted sperm analysis for assessing sperm mobility parameters in in vitro fertilization].
    Yuan P; Zhang Z; Luo C; Quan S; Chu Q; Zhao S
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2013 Mar; 33(3):448-50. PubMed ID: 23529251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of sperm subpopulation's kinetics on human fertilization in vitro.
    Jedrzejczak P; Rzepczyńska I; Taszarek-Hauke G; Pawelczyk L; Kotwicka M; Warchoł W
    Arch Androl; 2005; 51(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 16025857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a cut-off value for sperm motility after different hours of incubation to select the suitable reproductive technology (IVF or ICSI).
    Zollner U; Martin S; Liebermann J; Steck T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Apr; 78(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 10203301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The importance of computer-assisted semen analysis and sperm function testing in an IVF program.
    Joshi N; Kodwany G; Balaiah D; Parikh M; Parikh F
    Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1996; 41(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 8673156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitation of specific parameters of motility in large numbers of human sperm by digital image processing.
    Mack SO; Wolf DP; Tash JS
    Biol Reprod; 1988 Mar; 38(2):270-81. PubMed ID: 3358975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the sperm motility analyzer system (SMAS) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.
    Akashi T; Watanabe A; Komiya A; Fuse H
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2010 Dec; 56(6):473-7. PubMed ID: 20662592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between morphology and motion characteristics of human spermatozoa in semen and in the swim-up sperm fractions.
    Oehninger S; Acosta R; Morshedi M; Philput C; Swanson RJ; Acosta AA
    J Androl; 1990; 11(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 2254178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) potential of human spermatozoa using sperm function tests: the effect of the delay between testing and IVF.
    Sukcharoen N; Keith J; Irvine DS; Aitken RJ
    Hum Reprod; 1996 May; 11(5):1030-4. PubMed ID: 8671385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examination of data from programs of in vitro fertilization in relation to sperm integrity and reproductive success.
    Rogers BJ
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 302():69-89; discussion 90-3. PubMed ID: 2666992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive value of classical and automated sperm analysis for in-vitro fertilization.
    Barlow P; Delvigne A; Van Dromme J; Van Hoeck J; Vandenbosch K; Leroy F
    Hum Reprod; 1991 Sep; 6(8):1119-24. PubMed ID: 1806572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sperm recovery and survival: two tests that predict in vitro fertilization outcome.
    Stovall DW; Guzick DS; Berga SL; Krasnow JS; Zeleznik AJ
    Fertil Steril; 1994 Dec; 62(6):1244-9. PubMed ID: 7957992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the effect of the absence of sperm with rapid and linear progressive motility on subsequent pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization.
    Bollendorf A; Check JH; Lurie D
    J Androl; 1996; 17(5):550-7. PubMed ID: 8957699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro fertilization and pregnancy rates: the influence of sperm motility and morphology on IVF outcome.
    Donnelly ET; Lewis SE; McNally JA; Thompson W
    Fertil Steril; 1998 Aug; 70(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 9696226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.