These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Ultrasound is a reproducible and valid tool for measuring scar height in children with burn scars: A cross-sectional study of the psychometric properties and utility of the ultrasound and 3D camera. Simons M; Kee EG; Kimble R; Tyack Z Burns; 2017 Aug; 43(5):993-1001. PubMed ID: 28238405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An effective procedure for skin stiffness measurement to improve Paediatric Burn Care. Elrod J; Müller B; Mohr C; Meuli M; Mazza E; Schiestl C Burns; 2019 Aug; 45(5):1102-1111. PubMed ID: 30833098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: interrater reliability and concurrent validity. Nedelec B; Correa JA; Rachelska G; Armour A; LaSalle L J Burn Care Res; 2008; 29(3):501-11. PubMed ID: 18388576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Intra-rater reliability and validity of ultrasonography in the evaluation of hypertrophic scars caused by burns. Lee SY; Cho YS; Kim L; Joo SY; Seo CH Burns; 2023 Mar; 49(2):344-352. PubMed ID: 35459576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: intrarater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity. Nedelec B; Correa JA; Rachelska G; Armour A; LaSalle L J Burn Care Res; 2008; 29(3):489-500. PubMed ID: 18388577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of tape for the management of hypertrophic scar development: A comprehensive review. O'Reilly S; Crofton E; Brown J; Strong J; Ziviani J Scars Burn Heal; 2021; 7():20595131211029206. PubMed ID: 34290886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incorporation of 3D stereophotogrammetry as a reliable method for assessing scar volume in standard clinical practice. Peake M; Pan K; Rotatori RM; Powell H; Fowler L; James L; Dale E Burns; 2019 Nov; 45(7):1614-1620. PubMed ID: 31208769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ablative fractional CO Issler-Fisher AC; Fisher OM; Smialkowski AO; Li F; van Schalkwyk CP; Haertsch P; Maitz PKM Burns; 2017 May; 43(3):573-582. PubMed ID: 27707636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pressure garment to prevent abnormal scarring after burn injury in adults and children: the PEGASUS feasibility RCT and mixed-methods study. Moiemen N; Mathers J; Jones L; Bishop J; Kinghorn P; Monahan M; Calvert M; Slinn G; Gardiner F; Bamford A; Wright S; Litchfield I; Andrews N; Turner K; Grant M; Deeks J Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jun; 22(36):1-162. PubMed ID: 29947328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) in objective scar evaluation. Lau JC; Li-Tsang CW; Zheng YP Burns; 2005 Jun; 31(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 15896506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Scarbase Duo(®): Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and validity of a compact dual scar assessment tool. Fell M; Meirte J; Anthonissen M; Maertens K; Pleat J; Moortgat P Burns; 2016 Mar; 42(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 26774602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of the predictors of hypertrophic scarring pain and neuropathic pain after burn. Shu F; Liu H; Lou X; Zhou Z; Zhao Z; Liu Y; Bai X; Luo P; Zheng Y; Xiao S; Xia Z Burns; 2022 Sep; 48(6):1425-1434. PubMed ID: 34670714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]