531 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27574819)
21. Feasibility for active surveillance in biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 prostate cancer: an Australian radical prostatectomy cohort.
Wong LM; Tang V; Peters J; Costello A; Corcoran N
BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117 Suppl 4():82-7. PubMed ID: 27094971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Preoperative characteristics of men with unfavorable high-Gleason prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Pierorazio PM; Lin BM; Mullins JK; Hyndman ME; Schaeffer EM; Han M; Partin AW; Pavlovich CP
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 21664838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Favorable Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer Shows Comparable Outcomes With Gleason 3 + 3 Prostate Cancer: Implications for the Expansion of Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance.
Lee H; Lee IJ; Byun SS; Lee SE; Hong SK
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Dec; 15(6):e1117-e1122. PubMed ID: 28843377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A biopsy-integrated algorithm for determining Gleason 6 upgrading risk stratifies risk of active surveillance failure in prostate cancer.
Blute ML; Shiau JM; Truong M; Shi F; Abel EJ; Downs TM; Jarrard DF
World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):729-735. PubMed ID: 27631325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.
Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):907-912. PubMed ID: 27876305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prostate-specific antigen density predicts favorable pathology and biochemical recurrence in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Kang HW; Jung HD; Lee JY; Kwon JK; Jeh SU; Cho KS; Ham WS; Choi YD
Asian J Androl; 2016; 18(3):480-4. PubMed ID: 26178393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predictors for clinically relevant Gleason score upgrade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Thomas C; Pfirrmann K; Pieles F; Bogumil A; Gillitzer R; Wiesner C; Thüroff JW; Melchior SW
BJU Int; 2012 Jan; 109(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 21592293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Heterogeneity in D'Amico classification-based low-risk prostate cancer: Differences in upgrading and upstaging according to active surveillance eligibility.
Schiffmann J; Wenzel P; Salomon G; Budäus L; Schlomm T; Minner S; Wittmer C; Kraft S; Krech T; Steurer S; Sauter G; Beyer B; Boehm K; Tilki D; Michl U; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):329.e13-9. PubMed ID: 25960411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prostate cancer upgrading or downgrading of biopsy Gleason scores at radical prostatectomy: prediction of "regression to the mean" using routine clinical features with correlating biochemical relapse rates.
Altok M; Troncoso P; Achim MF; Matin SF; Gonzalez GN; Davis JW
Asian J Androl; 2019; 21(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 31115364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.
Moussa AS; Li J; Soriano M; Klein EA; Dong F; Jones JS
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is active surveillance a safe alternative in the management of localized prostate cancer? Pathological features of radical prostatectomy specimens in potential candidates for active surveillance.
Norman Z; Militza P; Andres F; Daniela F; Alejandro M; Catherine S; Juan F
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 24856482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Combined value of validated clinical and genomic risk stratification tools for predicting prostate cancer mortality in a high-risk prostatectomy cohort.
Cooperberg MR; Davicioni E; Crisan A; Jenkins RB; Ghadessi M; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):326-33. PubMed ID: 24998118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Selecting Patients with Favorable Risk, Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance-Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Have a Role?
Stonier T; Tin AL; Sjoberg DD; Jibara G; Vickers AJ; Fine S; Eastham J
J Urol; 2021 Apr; 205(4):1063-1068. PubMed ID: 33216696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades.
Epstein JI; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Pierorazio PM
Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):1019-24. PubMed ID: 22336380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pathological outcomes in men with low risk and very low risk prostate cancer: implications on the practice of active surveillance.
Tosoian JJ; JohnBull E; Trock BJ; Landis P; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Carter HB
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1218-22. PubMed ID: 23643603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prediction of extraprostatic extension in patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer.
Lin S; Zhang Q; Li P; Li Z; Sun Y; Shao Y; Zhang X; Fu S
Urol Int; 2014; 92(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 24280781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prediction of pathologic upgrading in Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer: Who is a candidate for active surveillance?
Pham DM; Kim JK; Lee S; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE
Investig Clin Urol; 2020 Jul; 61(4):405-410. PubMed ID: 32665997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of Initial Gleason Grade on Outcomes during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
Masic S; Cowan JE; Washington SL; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):386-394. PubMed ID: 31158077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of predictors of unfavorable pathological features in men eligible for active surveillance using radical prostatectomy specimens: a multi-institutional study.
Mizuno K; Inoue T; Kinoshita H; Yano T; Kawanishi H; Kanda H; Terada N; Kobayashi T; Kamba T; Mikami Y; Shiraishi T; Uemura Y; Imai Y; Honjo G; Shirase T; Okumura K; Kawakita M; Ogura K; Sugimura Y; Matsuda T; Ogawa O
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2016 Dec; 46(12):1156-1161. PubMed ID: 27744325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
