These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2757482)

  • 1. End points and significance of reproducibility in pathology.
    Henson DE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 Aug; 113(8):830-1. PubMed ID: 2757482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic error in anatomical pathology: the uncertainty of its measurement?
    Bryant SJ; Davies DJ
    Pathology; 2006 Dec; 38(6):487-9. PubMed ID: 17393974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The cyto-histologic comparison].
    Di Bonito L; Dudine S; Bonifacio D; Romano A; Zanconati F; Martellani F; Gerardi E
    Pathologica; 2005 Aug; 97(4):197-8. PubMed ID: 16440658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Elements of standardization of the histopathologic report].
    Zafrani B
    Ann Pathol; 1997; 17 Suppl 5():68-9. PubMed ID: 9453728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Best practices for reporting pathology interpretations within GLP toxicology studies.
    Morton D; Kemp RK; Francke-Carroll S; Jensen K; McCartney J; Monticello TM; Perry R; Pulido O; Roome N; Schafer K; Sellers R; Snyder PW
    Toxicol Pathol; 2006; 34(6):806-9. PubMed ID: 17162539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Bethesda Interobserver Reproducibility Study (BIRST): a web-based assessment of the Bethesda 2001 System for classifying cervical cytology.
    Sherman ME; Dasgupta A; Schiffman M; Nayar R; Solomon D
    Cancer; 2007 Feb; 111(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 17186503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monitoring anatomic pathology practice through quality assurance measures.
    Zarbo RJ
    Clin Lab Med; 1999 Dec; 19(4):713-42, v. PubMed ID: 10572711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Predictive pathology: concept and dimensions of clinical trials].
    Schölmerich J
    Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 2006; 90():52-8. PubMed ID: 17867580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [How important is the clinical context for a histopathological diagnosis?].
    Bosman FT
    Rev Med Suisse; 2005 Nov; 1(43):2779-83. PubMed ID: 16396366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of methods used to quantify cell hyperplasia.
    Basgen JM; Mauer M
    Kidney Int; 2001 Jan; 59(1):384-5. PubMed ID: 11135098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CADI, Canti, Cavi.
    Colvin RB
    Transplantation; 2007 Mar; 83(6):677-8. PubMed ID: 17414694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
    Zaino RJ; Kauderer J; Trimble CL; Silverberg SG; Curtin JP; Lim PC; Gallup DG
    Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):804-11. PubMed ID: 16400640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Direction for improvement of pathoanatomical work in modern armed conflicts].
    Semkin LB; Filatov VV; Tregubov VN
    Voen Med Zh; 2002 Aug; 323(8):15-8. PubMed ID: 12379023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The H&E technique: old mistress apologue.
    Rosai J
    Pathologica; 1998 Dec; 90(6):739-42. PubMed ID: 10220992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Confusing tissue samples: causes, consequences, prevention].
    Banaschak S; Witting C; Brinkmann B
    Pathologe; 1999 May; 20(3):155-8. PubMed ID: 10412174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Objectives and conditions of quality control in surgery and their prerequisites in pathology].
    Schega W
    Pathologe; 1980 May; 1(3):116-20. PubMed ID: 7454683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of immunostaining quantification and description of a new digital image processing procedure for quantitative evaluation of immunohistochemistry in pathology.
    Bernardo V; Lourenço SQ; Cruz R; Monteiro-Leal LH; Silva LE; Camisasca DR; Farina M; Lins U
    Microsc Microanal; 2009 Aug; 15(4):353-65. PubMed ID: 19575836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variability in gross and microscopic pathology reporting in excisional biopsies of breast cancer tissue.
    Apple SK
    Breast J; 2006; 12(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16509839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Criteria for molecular biological diagnosis in pathology].
    Hummel M
    Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 1994; 78():161-5. PubMed ID: 7533979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mandatory second opinion surgical pathology at a large referral hospital.
    Sirota RL
    Cancer; 2000 Jul; 89(1):225-6. PubMed ID: 10897028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.