These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27574912)

  • 1. Assessing the reproducibility of high definition urethral pressure profilometry and its correlation with an air-charged system.
    Klünder M; Amend B; Sawodny O; Stenzl A; Ederer M; Kelp A; Sievert KD; Feuer R
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Jun; 36(5):1292-1300. PubMed ID: 27574912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High definition urethral pressure profilometry: Evaluating a novel microtip catheter.
    Klünder M; Amend B; Vaegler M; Kelp A; Feuer R; Sievert KD; Stenzl A; Sawodny O; Ederer M
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Nov; 35(8):888-894. PubMed ID: 26207994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Signal processing in urodynamics: towards high definition urethral pressure profilometry.
    Klünder M; Sawodny O; Amend B; Ederer M; Kelp A; Sievert KD; Stenzl A; Feuer R
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Mar; 15():31. PubMed ID: 27000558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized comparison of microtip and air-charged catheter for the measurement of maximum urethral closure pressure.
    Mueller MM; Baumann MU; Mueller MD; Kuhn A
    Ginekol Pol; 2012 Aug; 83(8):586-9. PubMed ID: 23342881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of urethral profilometry using microtip and fiberoptic catheters.
    Elser DM; London W; Fantl JA; McBride MA; Beck RP
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 1999; 10(6):371-4. PubMed ID: 10614972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Air charged and microtip catheters cannot be used interchangeably for urethral pressure measurement: a prospective, single-blind, randomized trial.
    Zehnder P; Roth B; Burkhard FC; Kessler TM
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):1013-7. PubMed ID: 18639301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences between water-filled and air-charged urodynamic catheters for determining the urethral pressure profile in neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction patients.
    Zhao H; Liao L; Deng H; Wang Y
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Aug; 38(6):1760-1766. PubMed ID: 31215070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re: Klünder et al: High definition urethral pressure profilometry: Evaluating a novel microtip catheter and Klünder et al: Assessing the reproducibility of high definition urethral pressure profilometry and its correlation with an air-charged system.
    Schaefer W
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Nov; 36(8):2184-2187. PubMed ID: 28220530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term test-retest reproducibility of urethral pressure profilometry in women with urodynamic stress incontinence with and without detrusor overactivity.
    Rahmanou P; Khullar V
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Sep; 30(7):1356-60. PubMed ID: 21538497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of urethral pressure profilometry using microtip and double-lumen perfusion catheters in women with genuine stress incontinence.
    Wang AC; Chen MC
    BJOG; 2002 Mar; 109(3):322-6. PubMed ID: 11950188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of water perfusion catheters and microtip transducer catheters for urethral pressure measurements.
    Kuhn A; Nager CW; Hawkins E; Schulz J; Stanton SL
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Aug; 18(8):931-5. PubMed ID: 17131168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discriminant analysis of urethral pressure profilometry data for the diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence.
    Versi E
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Mar; 97(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 2334653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Urethral pressure reflectometry vs urethral pressure profilometry in women: a comparative study of reproducibility and accuracy.
    Klarskov N; Lose G
    BJU Int; 2007 Aug; 100(2):351-6. PubMed ID: 17501964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of microtransducer and fiberoptic catheters for urodynamic studies.
    Culligan PJ; Goldberg RP; Blackhurst DW; Sasso K; Koduri S; Sand PK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Aug; 98(2):253-7. PubMed ID: 11506841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Urethral pressure reflectometry and pressure profilometry in healthy volunteers and stress urinary incontinent women.
    Klarskov N; Lose G
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(8):807-12. PubMed ID: 18551560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of the urethral closure pressure profile during stress in the diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence.
    Hanzal E; Berger E; Koelbl H
    Br J Urol; 1991 Oct; 68(4):369-71. PubMed ID: 1933156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Value of urethral pressure profilometry in the female incontinent patient: a prospective trial with an 8-channel urethral catheter.
    Haeusler G; Tempfer C; Heinzl H; Sam C; Hefler L; Hanzal E; Koelbl H
    Urology; 1998 Dec; 52(6):1113-7. PubMed ID: 9836565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eliminating pulse-induced artifacts in Urethral Pressure data.
    Klunder M; Feuer R; Amend B; Kelp A; Stenzl A; Sievert KD; Sawodny O; Ederer M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():2779-83. PubMed ID: 26736868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Valsalva leak point pressures in women with genuine stress incontinence: reproducibility, effect of catheter caliber, and correlations with other measures of urethral resistance. Continence Program for Women Research Group.
    Bump RC; Elser DM; Theofrastous JP; McClish DK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):551-7. PubMed ID: 7645634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneous diuresis cysto-urethrometry and multi-channel urethral pressure profilometry in female dogs with refractory urinary incontinence.
    Nickel RF; van den Brom W
    Am J Vet Res; 1997 Jul; 58(7):691-6. PubMed ID: 9215440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.