These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27575737)

  • 1. Marine Hydrokinetic Energy from Western Boundary Currents.
    Bane JM; He R; Muglia M; Lowcher CF; Gong Y; Haines SM
    Ann Rev Mar Sci; 2017 Jan; 9():105-123. PubMed ID: 27575737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marine energy.
    Kerr D
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2007 Apr; 365(1853):971-92. PubMed ID: 17272244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Geophysical potential for wind energy over the open oceans.
    Possner A; Caldeira K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Oct; 114(43):11338-11343. PubMed ID: 29073053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wind energy.
    Leithead WE
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2007 Apr; 365(1853):957-70. PubMed ID: 17272245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wind speed reductions by large-scale wind turbine deployments lower turbine efficiencies and set low generation limits.
    Miller LM; Kleidon A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Nov; 113(48):13570-13575. PubMed ID: 27849587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Potential impacts of floating wind turbine technology for marine species and habitats.
    Maxwell SM; Kershaw F; Locke CC; Conners MG; Dawson C; Aylesworth S; Loomis R; Johnson AF
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 307():114577. PubMed ID: 35091240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How could operational underwater sound from future offshore wind turbines impact marine life?
    Stöber U; Thomsen F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Mar; 149(3):1791. PubMed ID: 33765823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Catching the right wave: evaluating wave energy resources and potential compatibility with existing marine and coastal uses.
    Kim CK; Toft JE; Papenfus M; Verutes G; Guerry AD; Ruckelshaus MH; Arkema KK; Guannel G; Wood SA; Bernhardt JR; Tallis H; Plummer ML; Halpern BS; Pinsky ML; Beck MW; Chan F; Chan KM; Levin PS; Polasky S
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e47598. PubMed ID: 23144824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Energy alternatives: Electricity without carbon.
    Schiermeier Q; Tollefson J; Scully T; Witze A; Morton O
    Nature; 2008 Aug; 454(7206):816-23. PubMed ID: 18704061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Solar energy in the context of energy use, energy transportation and energy storage.
    MacKay DJ
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2013 Aug; 371(1996):20110431. PubMed ID: 23816908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of the present and future offshore wind power potential: a case study in a target territory of the Baltic Sea near the Latvian coast.
    Lizuma L; Avotniece Z; Rupainis S; Teilans A
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():126428. PubMed ID: 23983619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Present Situation of Wind Turbine in Major European Countries and Outlook of Wind Turbine in Japan].
    Morimatsu Y
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2018; 73(3):278-283. PubMed ID: 30270294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Supply-side options to reduce land requirements of fully renewable electricity in Europe.
    Tröndle T
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236958. PubMed ID: 32760117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of renewable energy supply for green ports with a case study.
    Sadek I; Elgohary M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Feb; 27(5):5547-5558. PubMed ID: 31853847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of economic, energy, and exergy efficiencies using wind measurement mast data for different wind turbines.
    Kara O
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Sep; 30(43):97447-97462. PubMed ID: 37592072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planners to the rescue: spatial planning facilitating the development of offshore wind energy.
    Jay S
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2010 Apr; 60(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20004920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is There a Future for Nuclear Power? Wind and Emission Reduction Targets in Fossil-Fuel Alberta.
    van Kooten GC; Duan J; Lynch R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165822. PubMed ID: 27902712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of the Gulf Stream on the troposphere.
    Minobe S; Kuwano-Yoshida A; Komori N; Xie SP; Small RJ
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7184):206-9. PubMed ID: 18337820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical assessment of small-scale wind power for residential use in Mexico: A Bayesian intelligence approach.
    Borunda M; de la Cruz J; Garduno-Ramirez R; Nicholson A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0230122. PubMed ID: 32163479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling underwater noise propagation from marine hydrokinetic power devices through a time-domain, velocity-pressure solution.
    Hafla E; Johnson E; Johnson CN; Preston L; Aldridge D; Roberts JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):3242. PubMed ID: 29960489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.