These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27575779)

  • 21. Comparison of the effects of four different cochlear implant electrodes on intra-cochlear pressure in a model.
    Todt I; Mittmann M; Ernst A; Mittmann P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 137(3):235-241. PubMed ID: 27661767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Force and pressure measurements in temporal bones.
    Snels C; Roland JT; Treaba C; Jethanamest D; Huinck W; Friedmann DR; Dhooge I; Mylanus E
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(2):102859. PubMed ID: 33440250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of Cochlear Function during Cochlear Implantation by Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography.
    Dalbert A; Pfiffner F; Hoesli M; Koka K; Veraguth D; Roosli C; Huber A
    Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():18. PubMed ID: 29434534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of Intracochlear Air on Experimental Pressure Measurements.
    Riemann C; Sudhoff H; Todt I
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(1):34-39. PubMed ID: 34130281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Postinsertional Cable Movements of Cochlear Implant Electrodes and Their Effects on Intracochlear Pressure.
    Todt I; Karimi D; Luger J; Ernst A; Mittmann P
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():3937196. PubMed ID: 27900329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Summating Potential Is a Reliable Marker of Electrode Position in Electrocochleography: Cochlear Implant as a Theragnostic Probe.
    Helmstaedter V; Lenarz T; Erfurt P; Kral A; Baumhoff P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):687-700. PubMed ID: 29251689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of intracochlear trauma caused by the insertion of a new straight research array.
    Mukherjee P; Uzun-Coruhlu H; Wong CC; Curthoys IS; Jones AS; Gibson WP
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Aug; 13(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 22333934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Simultaneous Intra- and Extracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation to Enhance Response Interpretation.
    Sijgers L; Pfiffner F; Grosse J; Dillier N; Koka K; Röösli C; Huber A; Dalbert A
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216521990594. PubMed ID: 33710919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Effects of Gusher-Related Intracochlear Pressure Changes on Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: A Comparative Series.
    Crohan W; Krishnaswamy J; Rajan G
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(3):181-186. PubMed ID: 30304724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Advanced bionics thin lateral and Helix II electrodes: a temporal bone study.
    Wright CG; Roland PS; Kuzma J
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):2041-5. PubMed ID: 16319621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intracochlear Pressure Transients During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion: Effect of Micro-mechanical Control on Limiting Pressure Trauma.
    Banakis Hartl RM; Kaufmann C; Hansen MR; Tollin DJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jul; 40(6):736-744. PubMed ID: 31192901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The influence of insertion depth on the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation].
    Neumann M; Aschendorff A; Schipper J; Laszig R; Klenzner T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Feb; 84(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 15712047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn.
    van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; van der Marel KS; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 26891130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?
    Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 May; 126(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16698696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intracochlear pressure changes due to round window opening: a model experiment.
    Mittmann P; Ernst A; Todt I
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():341075. PubMed ID: 24982942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A new cochlear implant electrode design for preservation of residual hearing: a temporal bone study.
    Skarzynski H; Podskarbi-Fayette R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Apr; 130(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 19883172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of an electrode prototype for atraumatic cochlear implantation in hearing preservation candidates: preliminary results from a temporal bone study.
    Helbig S; Settevendemie C; Mack M; Baumann U; Helbig M; Stöver T
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Apr; 32(3):419-23. PubMed ID: 21307807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantitative in-vitro assessment of a novel robot-assisted system for cochlear implant electrode insertion.
    Aebischer P; Anschuetz L; Caversaccio M; Mantokoudis G; Weder S
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39352456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of Intracochlear Trauma Caused by Insertion of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays through Different Quadrants of the Round Window.
    Martins Gde S; Brito Neto RV; Tsuji RK; Gebrim EM; Bento RF
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():236364. PubMed ID: 26236719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hearing preservation via a cochleostomy approach and deep insertion of a standard length cochlear implant electrode.
    Bruce IA; Bates JE; Melling C; Mawman D; Green KM
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Dec; 32(9):1444-7. PubMed ID: 22089957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.