These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Successful Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair using 2- and 3-Dimensional Fusion Imaging without Further Contrast Enhancement. Iida Y; Yoshitake A; Shimizu H Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 May; 49():314.e11-314.e13. PubMed ID: 29481921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective observational trial of fusion imaging in infrarenal aneurysms. Maurel B; Martin-Gonzalez T; Chong D; Irwin A; Guimbretière G; Davis M; Mastracci TM J Vasc Surg; 2018 Dec; 68(6):1706-1713.e1. PubMed ID: 29804734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility and accuracy of fusion imaging during thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Schulz CJ; Schmitt M; Böckler D; Geisbüsch P J Vasc Surg; 2016 Feb; 63(2):314-22. PubMed ID: 26527424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endovascular aortic repair of a postdissecting thoracoabdominal aneurysm using intraoperative fusion imaging. Kaladji A; Dumenil A; Castro M; Haigron P; Heautot JF; Haulon S J Vasc Surg; 2013 Apr; 57(4):1109-12. PubMed ID: 23312941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pros and Cons of 3D Image Fusion in Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Goudeketting SR; Heinen SGH; Ünlü Ç; van den Heuvel DAF; de Vries JPM; van Strijen MJ; Sailer AM J Endovasc Ther; 2017 Aug; 24(4):595-603. PubMed ID: 28485198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orthogonal Rings, Fiducial Markers, and Overlay Accuracy When Image Fusion is Used for EVAR Guidance. Koutouzi G; Sandström C; Roos H; Henrikson O; Leonhardt H; Falkenberg M Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2016 Nov; 52(5):604-611. PubMed ID: 27614556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image fusion for hybrid repair of dislocated superior mesenteric branch of a branched endovascular aortic graft. Alomran F; Desgranges P; Majewski M; You K; Kobeiter H J Vasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 58(3):798-801. PubMed ID: 23380176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional electromagnetic navigation vs. fluoroscopy for endovascular aneurysm repair: a prospective feasibility study in patients. Manstad-Hulaas F; Tangen GA; Dahl T; Hernes TA; Aadahl P J Endovasc Ther; 2012 Feb; 19(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 22313205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography-fluoroscopy image fusion technique in guiding complex endovascular aortic procedures in patients with renal insufficiency. Schwein A; Chinnadurai P; Shah DJ; Lumsden AB; Bechara CF; Bismuth J J Vasc Surg; 2017 May; 65(5):1440-1452. PubMed ID: 28017584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-dimensional-three-dimensional registration for fusion imaging is noninferior to three-dimensional- three-dimensional registration in infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair. Schulz CJ; Böckler D; Krisam J; Geisbüsch P J Vasc Surg; 2019 Dec; 70(6):2005-2013. PubMed ID: 31147123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of three-dimensional fusion imaging with multimodality roadmap system during endovascular aortic repair. Hiraoka A; Shiraya S; Chikazawa G; Ishida A; Miyake K; Sakaguchi T; Yoshitaka H J Vasc Surg; 2018 Oct; 68(4):1175-1182. PubMed ID: 29615355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]