410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27575906)
1. The current state of prostate-specific antigen testing.
Lewis R; Hornberger B
JAAPA; 2016 Sep; 29(9):51-3. PubMed ID: 27575906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The efficacy of prostate-specific antigen screening: Impact of key components in the ERSPC and PLCO trials.
de Koning HJ; Gulati R; Moss SM; Hugosson J; Pinsky PF; Berg CD; Auvinen A; Andriole GL; Roobol MJ; Crawford ED; Nelen V; Kwiatkowski M; Zappa M; Luján M; Villers A; de Carvalho TM; Feuer EJ; Tsodikov A; Mariotto AB; Heijnsdijk EAM; Etzioni R
Cancer; 2018 Mar; 124(6):1197-1206. PubMed ID: 29211316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test: a review of current evidence.
Hayes JH; Barry MJ
JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(11):1143-9. PubMed ID: 24643604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of prostate cancer: the impact of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).
Schröder FH
Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():2-6; discussion 92-3. PubMed ID: 15780157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Counterpoint: Randomized trials provide the strongest evidence for clinical guidelines: The US Preventive Services Task Force and Prostate Cancer Screening.
Melnikow J; LeFevre M; Wilt TJ; Moyer VA
Med Care; 2013 Apr; 51(4):301-3. PubMed ID: 23481031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the United States Preventive Services Task Force 'D' recommendation on prostate cancer screening and staging.
Eapen RS; Herlemann A; Washington SL; Cooperberg MR
Curr Opin Urol; 2017 May; 27(3):205-209. PubMed ID: 28221220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized controlled screening trials for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen: a tale of contrasts.
Rove KO; Crawford ED
World J Urol; 2012 Apr; 30(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 22116599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Based Population Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Evidence-Based Analysis.
Pron G
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2015; 15(10):1-64. PubMed ID: 26366236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate-specific antigen-based screening: controversy and guidelines.
Kim EH; Andriole GL
BMC Med; 2015 Mar; 13():61. PubMed ID: 25857320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing contamination and compliance in the prostate component of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.
Pinsky PF; Blacka A; Kramer BS; Miller A; Prorok PC; Berg C
Clin Trials; 2010 Aug; 7(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 20571134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: program performances in the European Randomized Screening for Prostate Cancer trial and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovary cancer trial.
de Koning HJ; Auvinen A; Berenguer Sanchez A; Calais da Silva F; Ciatto S; Denis L; Gohagan JK; Hakama M; Hugosson J; Kranse R; Nelen V; Prorok PC; Schröder FH; ;
Int J Cancer; 2002 Jan; 97(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 11774270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PSA screening, prostate biopsy, and treatment of prostate cancer in the years surrounding the USPSTF recommendation against prostate cancer screening.
Kearns JT; Holt SK; Wright JL; Lin DW; Lange PH; Gore JL
Cancer; 2018 Jul; 124(13):2733-2739. PubMed ID: 29781117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Screening Trials and Revised PSA Screening Guidelines on Rates of Prostate Biopsy and Postbiopsy Complications.
Gershman B; Van Houten HK; Herrin J; Moreira DM; Kim SP; Shah ND; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Jan; 71(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 26995328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening for prostate cancer: the current evidence and guidelines controversy.
Gomella LG; Liu XS; Trabulsi EJ; Kelly WK; Myers R; Showalter T; Dicker A; Wender R
Can J Urol; 2011 Oct; 18(5):5875-83. PubMed ID: 22018148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PSA screening: determinants of primary-care physician practice patterns.
Tasian GE; Cooperberg MR; Potter MB; Cowan JE; Greene KL; Carroll PR; Chan JM
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2012 Jun; 15(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 22343837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limitations of basing screening policies on screening trials: The US Preventive Services Task Force and Prostate Cancer Screening.
Etzioni R; Gulati R; Cooperberg MR; Penson DM; Weiss NS; Thompson IM
Med Care; 2013 Apr; 51(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 23269114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. State-by-state Variation in Prostate-specific Antigen Screening Trends Following the 2011 United States Preventive Services Task Force Panel Update.
Vetterlein MW; Dalela D; Sammon JD; Karabon P; Sood A; Jindal T; Meyer CP; Löppenberg B; Sun M; Trinh QD; Menon M; Abdollah F
Urology; 2018 Feb; 112():56-65. PubMed ID: 29056579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term consequences of the USPSTF Grade D recommendation for prostate-specific antigen screening.
Joshi SS; Filson CP
Cancer; 2020 Feb; 126(4):694-696. PubMed ID: 31794066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate Cancer Screening and the Associated Controversy.
Tabayoyong W; Abouassaly R
Surg Clin North Am; 2015 Oct; 95(5):1023-39. PubMed ID: 26315521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
