293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27576115)
1. The effect of a whole heart motion-correction algorithm on CT image quality and measurement reproducibility in Pre-TAVR aortic annulus evaluation.
Soon J; Sulaiman N; Park JK; Kueh SH; Naoum C; Murphy D; Ellis J; Hague CJ; Blanke P; Leipsic J
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 27576115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated 3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Watanabe Y; Morice MC; Bouvier E; Leong T; Hayashida K; Lefèvre T; Hovasse T; Romano M; Chevalier B; Donzeau-Gouge P; Farge A; Cormier B; Garot P
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 6(9):955-64. PubMed ID: 23954060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effective diameter of the aortic annulus prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: influence of area-based versus perimeter-based calculation.
von Aspern K; Foldyna B; Etz CD; Hoyer A; Girrbach F; Holzhey D; Lücke C; Grothoff M; Linke A; Mohr FW; Gutberlet M; Lehmkuhl L
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 31(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 25165022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra- and Inter-Observer Reproducibility of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Planning Measurements by Multidetector Computed Tomography.
Heo R; Hartaighl B; Cho I; Valenti V; Leipsic J; Wong SC; Salemi A; Minutello RM; Bergman G; Min JK
J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Sep; 24(5):560-9. PubMed ID: 26897834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reproducibility of aortic annulus sizing using a dedicated three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction tool in patients evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Stortecky S; Heg D; Gloekler S; Wenaweser P; Windecker S; Buellesfeld L
EuroIntervention; 2014 Jul; 10(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 24273249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT evaluation prior to transapical aortic valve replacement: semi-automatic versus manual image segmentation.
Foldyna B; Jungert C; Luecke C; von Aspern K; Boehmer-Lasthaus S; Rueth EM; Grothoff M; Nitzsche S; Gutberlet M; Mohr FW; Lehmkuhl L
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Aug; 31(6):1233-42. PubMed ID: 25893746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated 3D analysis of pre-procedural MDCT to predict annulus plane angulation and C-arm positioning: benefit on procedural outcome in patients referred for TAVR.
Samim M; Stella PR; Agostoni P; Kluin J; Ramjankhan F; Budde RP; Sieswerda G; Algeri E; van Belle C; Elkalioubie A; Juthier F; Belkacemi A; Bertrand ME; Doevendans PA; Van Belle E
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 6(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 23489538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multidetector CT predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Freeman M; Webb JG; Willson AB; Wheeler M; Blanke P; Moss RR; Thompson CR; Munt B; Norgaard BL; Yang TH; Min JK; Poulsen S; Hansson NC; Binder RK; Toggweiler S; Hague C; Wood DA; Pibarot P; Leipsic J
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(4):248-55. PubMed ID: 24148778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT before transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Value of venous phase imaging for detection and interpretation of findings with impact on the TAVR procedure.
Roller FC; Schuhbaeck A; Achenbach S; Krombach GA; Schneider C
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(5):422-7. PubMed ID: 25939252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Photon-counting CT-angiography in pre-TAVR aortic annulus assessment: effects of retrospective vs. prospective ECG-synchronization on prosthesis valve selection.
Hagar MT; Kluemper T; Hein M; von Zur Muhlen C; Faby S; Capilli F; Schuppert C; Schmitt R; Ruile P; Westermann D; Schlett CL; Bamberg F; Krauss T; Soschynski M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Apr; 40(4):811-820. PubMed ID: 38360986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do CTA measurements of annular diameter, perimeter and area result in different TAVI prosthesis sizes?
Horehledova B; Mihl C; Hendriks BMF; Eijsvoogel NG; Vainer J; Veenstra LF; Wildberger JE; Das M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 34(11):1819-1829. PubMed ID: 29909590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Practical considerations for optimizing cardiac computed tomography protocols for comprehensive acquisition prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Khalique OK; Pulerwitz TC; Halliburton SS; Kodali SK; Hahn RT; Nazif TM; Vahl TP; George I; Leon MB; D'Souza B; Einstein AJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(5):364-74. PubMed ID: 27475972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic characterization of aortic annulus geometry and morphology with multimodality imaging: predictive value for aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Masri A; Schoenhagen P; Svensson L; Kapadia SR; Griffin BP; Tuzcu EM; Desai MY
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jun; 147(6):1847-54. PubMed ID: 23870156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of institutional volume and experience with CT interpretation on sizing of transcatheter aortic valves: A multicenter retrospective study.
Verma DR; Pershad Y; Pershad A; Fang K; Gellert G; Morris MF
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):566-570. PubMed ID: 27641485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated 3D analysis of multislice computed tomography to define the line of perpendicularity of the aortic annulus and of the implanted valve: benefit on planning transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Samin M; Juthier F; Van Belle C; Agostoni P; Kluin J; Stella PR; Ramjankhan F; Budde RP; Sieswerda G; Algeri E; Elkalioubie A; Belkacemi A; Bertrand ME; Doevendans PA; Van Belle E
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 83(1):E119-27. PubMed ID: 23592336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for aortic annular sizing in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Sherif MA; Ince H; Maniuc O; Reiter T; Voelker W; Ertl G; Öner A
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2015 Dec; 15():181. PubMed ID: 26715337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of short roll C-arm computed tomography and fully automated 3D analysis tools to guide transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Kim MS; Bracken J; Eshuis P; Chen SY; Fullerton D; Cleveland J; Messenger JC; Carroll JD
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 32(7):1145-52. PubMed ID: 27091735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conformational pulsatile changes of the aortic annulus: impact on prosthesis sizing by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Blanke P; Russe M; Leipsic J; Reinöhl J; Ebersberger U; Suranyi P; Siepe M; Pache G; Langer M; Schoepf UJ
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Sep; 5(9):984-94. PubMed ID: 22995887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Non-Contrast Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Computed Tomography Angiography for Aortic Annular Sizing Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Wang J; Jagasia DH; Kondapally YR; Herrmann HC; Han Y
J Invasive Cardiol; 2017 Jul; 29(7):239-245. PubMed ID: 28570260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aortic root dimensions among patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Buellesfeld L; Stortecky S; Kalesan B; Gloekler S; Khattab AA; Nietlispach F; Delfine V; Huber C; Eberle B; Meier B; Wenaweser P; Windecker S
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jan; 6(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 23347864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
