These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27576151)

  • 41. Are Efficient Designs Used in Discrete Choice Experiments Too Difficult for Some Respondents? A Case Study Eliciting Preferences for End-of-Life Care.
    Flynn TN; Bilger M; Malhotra C; Finkelstein EA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 Mar; 34(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 26589411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An introduction to "discrete choice experiments" for behavior analysts.
    Friedel JE; Foreman AM; Wirth O
    Behav Processes; 2022 May; 198():104628. PubMed ID: 35354088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Discrete choice experiments in pharmacy: a review of the literature.
    Naik-Panvelkar P; Armour C; Saini B
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2013 Feb; 21(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 23301529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. How to do (or not to do) ... Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country.
    Mangham LJ; Hanson K; McPake B
    Health Policy Plan; 2009 Mar; 24(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 19112071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Ryan M; Gerard K
    Health Econ; 2012 Feb; 21(2):145-72. PubMed ID: 22223558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. What Do Patients Want from Otolaryngologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Naunheim MR; Rathi VK; Naunheim ML; Alkire BC; Lam AC; Song PC; Shrime MG
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Oct; 157(4):618-624. PubMed ID: 28675119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Best Practices for Designing Discrete Choice Experiments and the Use for Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment.
    Engelsma T; Jaspers MWM; Turner AM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2020 Jun; 270():1213-1214. PubMed ID: 32570585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments.
    Ryan M; Watson V
    Health Econ; 2009 Apr; 18(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 18677721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Validity and Reliability of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates: Evidence from Two Overlapping Discrete-Choice Experiments.
    Telser H; Becker K; Zweifel P
    Patient; 2008 Dec; 1(4):283-98. PubMed ID: 22272996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Discrete Choice Experiment Response Rates: A Meta-analysis.
    Watson V; Becker F; de Bekker-Grob E
    Health Econ; 2017 Jun; 26(6):810-817. PubMed ID: 27122445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Temporal Stability of Stated Preferences: The Case of Junior Nursing Jobs.
    Doiron D; Yoo HI
    Health Econ; 2017 Jun; 26(6):802-809. PubMed ID: 27075055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. MCDA swing weighting and discrete choice experiments for elicitation of patient benefit-risk preferences: a critical assessment.
    Tervonen T; Gelhorn H; Sri Bhashyam S; Poon JL; Gries KS; Rentz A; Marsh K
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1483-1491. PubMed ID: 28696023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.
    Hauber AB; González JM; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; Prior T; Marshall DA; Cunningham C; IJzerman MJ; Bridges JF
    Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):300-15. PubMed ID: 27325321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Context effects and the temporal stability of stated preferences.
    Liebe U; Hundeshagen C; Beyer H; Cramon-Taubadel SV
    Soc Sci Res; 2016 Nov; 60():135-147. PubMed ID: 27712674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Including risk in stated-preference economic valuations: Experiments on choices for marine recreation.
    Wielgus J; Gerber LR; Sala E; Bennett J
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3401-9. PubMed ID: 19520490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Internal Validity of Discrete Choice Experiment Data: A Testing Tool for Quantitative Assessments.
    Johnson FR; Yang JC; Reed SD
    Value Health; 2019 Feb; 22(2):157-160. PubMed ID: 30711059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Exploring Differences between TTO and DCE in the Valuation of Health States.
    Robinson A; Spencer AE; Pinto-Prades JL; Covey JA
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Apr; 37(3):273-284. PubMed ID: 27646566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A pilot discrete choice experiment to explore preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states.
    Norman R; Cronin P; Viney R
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Jun; 11(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 23649892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Sensitivity and Specificity of Repeated and Dominant Choice Tasks in Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Jonker MF; Roudijk B; Maas M
    Value Health; 2022 Aug; 25(8):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 35527163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Order of Presentation of Dimensions Does Not Systematically Bias Utility Weights from a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Norman R; Kemmler G; Viney R; Pickard AS; Gamper E; Holzner B; Nerich V; King M
    Value Health; 2016 Dec; 19(8):1033-1038. PubMed ID: 27987630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.