These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27577066)

  • 1. Editorial: CORR's New Peer-Reviewer Tool-Useful for More Than Peer Reviews.
    Leopold SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2321-2322. PubMed ID: 27577066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Editorial: peer reviewers make it all possible at Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®.
    Leopold SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3693-4. PubMed ID: 26463568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review.
    Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What happens to your submission at Australasian Journal on Ageing?
    Parkinson L; Sims J
    Australas J Ageing; 2017 Jun; 36(2):87-88. PubMed ID: 28635096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer Review in Transplantation.
    Hutchinson JA
    Transplantation; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1746-8. PubMed ID: 26308410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Editorial: Thanking CORR's Peer Reviewers and Remembering Lee Beadling, a Friend and Partner Who Loved Working With Them.
    Leopold SS; Calabro AM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Dec; 478(12):2691-2693. PubMed ID: 33165036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Editorial: Thanking CORR's Peer Reviewers.
    Leopold SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Dec; 477(12):2615-2616. PubMed ID: 31764320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Independence Day.
    Heinemann MK
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Mar; 65(2):73. PubMed ID: 28282657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. So you want to publish your research in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis?
    Greaves M
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Mar; 15(3):405-410. PubMed ID: 27966273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Useful reviews.
    Parkinson L
    Australas J Ageing; 2018 Jun; 37(2):87. PubMed ID: 29870147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process.
    Elmore SA
    Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Dec; 45(8):1028-1031. PubMed ID: 29145784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to review a paper for Heart.
    Otto CM
    Heart; 2015 Jan; 101(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25502328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
    Nylenna M
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Being a Great Reviewer: Remembering the "Why".
    Moliterno DJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(20):2130-2131. PubMed ID: 30336820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
    Newton DP
    Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Your role and responsibilities in the manuscript peer review process.
    Brazeau GA; Dipiro JT; Fincham JE; Boucher BA; Tracy TS
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2008 Jun; 72(3):69. PubMed ID: 18698392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fortifying the external peer review: an editorial perspective.
    Sohail S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Jan; 25(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 25604359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Standardization of reviews of scientific publications].
    Ventura AG
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(4):574-5; author reply 575. PubMed ID: 19839127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.
    Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
    Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mentored Reviews: Maintaining the Transparency and Confidentiality of Peer Review.
    Rogers RG
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(5):291. PubMed ID: 27564384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.